Demographics details for Peculiar, MO vs Quimby, IA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Peculiar, MO vs Quimby, IA.
| Data | Peculiar | Quimby |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 5,958 | 244 |
| Median Age | 36.2 years | 50.4 years |
| Median Income | $91,783 | $57,500 |
| Married Families | 34.0% | 61.0% |
| Poverty Level | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | Data is updating |
Population Comparison: Peculiar vs Quimby
- In Peculiar, the population is higher at 5,958, compared to 244 in Quimby.
- The median age in Quimby is higher at 50.4 years, compared to 36.2 years in Peculiar.
- Peculiar has a higher median income of $91,783 compared to $57,500 in Quimby.
- In Quimby, the percentage of married families is higher at 61.0%, compared to 34.0% in Peculiar.
- The poverty level is identical in both Peculiar and Quimby at 0%.
- The unemployment rate in Peculiar is higher at 3.5%, compared to 0.0% in Quimby.
Demographics
Demographics Peculiar vs Quimby provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Peculiar | Quimby |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 3 | Data is updating |
| White | 83 | 76 |
| Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 7 | 24 |
| Two or More Races | 7 | Data is updating |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Peculiar vs Quimby
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Peculiar at 3% compared to 0% in Quimby.
- Peculiar has a higher percentage of White residents at 83% compared to 76% in Quimby.
- Both Peculiar and Quimby have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- Quimby has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 24%, compared to 7% in Peculiar.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Peculiar at 7% compared to 0% in Quimby.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Peculiar and Quimby at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Peculiar | Quimby |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.9% | 15.6% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.9% | 9.6% |
| Depression | 24.1% | 18.9% |
| Smoking | 18.3% | 17.5% |
| Binge Drinking | 18.0% | 21.7% |
| Obesity | 37.0% | 41.1% |
| Disability Percentage | 14.0% | 22.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Peculiar vs Quimby
- More residents in Peculiar report poor mental health at 16.9% compared to 15.6% in Quimby.
- Depression is more prevalent in Peculiar at 24.1% compared to 18.9% in Quimby.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Peculiar at 18.3% compared to 17.5% in Quimby.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Quimby at 21.7% compared to 18.0% in Peculiar.
- Quimby has higher obesity rates at 41.1% compared to 37.0% in Peculiar.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Quimby at 22.0% compared to 14.0% in Peculiar.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Peculiar | Quimby |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 13.2% (785) | 41.8% (102) |
| Less than High School | 9.9% (591) | 30.3% (74) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 13.2% (787) | 9.8% (24) |
Education Levels Comparison: Peculiar vs Quimby
- The percentage of residents with no formal schooling is the same in both Peculiar and Quimby at 0.0%.
- In Quimby, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 41.8% compared to 13.2% in Peculiar.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Quimby at 30.3%, compared to 9.9% in Peculiar.
- A higher percentage of residents in Peculiar hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 13.2% compared to 9.8% in Quimby.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.