Demographics details for Pearland, TX vs Cedar lake, IN
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Pearland, TX vs Cedar lake, IN.
Data | Pearland | Cedar lake |
---|---|---|
Population | 126,949 | 15,592 |
Median Age | 36.2 years | 39.5 years |
Median Income | $111,123 | $84,444 |
Married Families | 44.0% | 40.0% |
Poverty Level | 8% | 5% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.1 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Pearland vs Cedar lake
- In Pearland, the population is higher at 126,949, compared to 15,592 in Cedar lake.
- The median age in Cedar lake is higher at 39.5 years, compared to 36.2 years in Pearland.
- Pearland has a higher median income of $111,123 compared to $84,444 in Cedar lake.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Pearland at 44.0% compared to 40.0% in Cedar lake.
- Pearland has a higher poverty level at 8% compared to 5% in Cedar lake.
- The unemployment rate in Pearland is higher at 4.1%, compared to 3.5% in Cedar lake.
Demographics
Demographics Pearland vs Cedar lake provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Pearland | Cedar lake |
---|---|---|
Black | 18 | Data is updating |
White | 28 | 94 |
Asian | 16 | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 26 | 3 |
Two or More Races | 12 | 3 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Pearland vs Cedar lake
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Pearland at 18% compared to 0% in Cedar lake.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Cedar lake at 94% compared to 28% in Pearland.
- The Asian population is larger in Pearland at 16% compared to 0% in Cedar lake.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Pearland at 26% compared to 3% in Cedar lake.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Pearland at 12% compared to 3% in Cedar lake.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Pearland and Cedar lake at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Pearland | Cedar lake |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 14.1% | 16.6% |
Physical Health Not Good | 8.9% | 11.1% |
Depression | 19.1% | 25.4% |
Smoking | 11.7% | 18.8% |
Binge Drinking | 19.3% | 19.8% |
Obesity | 34.4% | 37.2% |
Disability Percentage | 7.0% | 10.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Pearland vs Cedar lake
- In Cedar lake, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 16.6% compared to 14.1% in Pearland.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Cedar lake at 25.4% versus 19.1% in Pearland.
- Cedar lake has a higher smoking rate at 18.8% compared to 11.7% in Pearland.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Cedar lake at 19.8% compared to 19.3% in Pearland.
- Cedar lake has higher obesity rates at 37.2% compared to 34.4% in Pearland.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Cedar lake at 10.0% compared to 7.0% in Pearland.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Pearland | Cedar lake |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.8% (1,006) | 0.4% (67) |
High School Diploma | 9.6% (12,136) | 21.1% (3,292) |
Less than High School | 5.3% (6,689) | 7.1% (1,102) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 29.9% (38,013) | 14.1% (2,204) |
Education Levels Comparison: Pearland vs Cedar lake
- A higher percentage of residents in Pearland have no formal schooling at 0.8% compared to 0.4% in Cedar lake.
- In Cedar lake, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 21.1% compared to 9.6% in Pearland.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Cedar lake at 7.1%, compared to 5.3% in Pearland.
- A higher percentage of residents in Pearland hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 29.9% compared to 14.1% in Cedar lake.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.