Demographics details for Pearl city, HI vs Thompsons station, TN

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Pearl city, HI vs Thompsons station, TN.

Data Pearl city Thompsons station
Population 46,812 8,199
Median Age 44.2 years 36.1 years
Median Income $116,938 $116,569
Married Families 44.0% 44.0%
Poverty Level 7% 3%
Unemployment Rate 2.5 2.6

Population Comparison: Pearl city vs Thompsons station

  • In Pearl city, the population is higher at 46,812, compared to 8,199 in Thompsons station.
  • Residents in Pearl city have a higher median age of 44.2 years compared to 36.1 years in Thompsons station.
  • Pearl city has a higher median income of $116,938 compared to $116,569 in Thompsons station.
  • The percentage of married families is the same in both Pearl city and Thompsons station at 44.0%.
  • Pearl city has a higher poverty level at 7% compared to 3% in Thompsons station.
  • Thompsons station has a higher unemployment rate at 2.6% compared to 2.5% in Pearl city.

Demographics

Demographics Pearl city vs Thompsons station provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Pearl city Thompsons station
Black 2 2
White 10 84
Asian 55 4
Hispanic 9 1
Two or More Races 24 11
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Pearl city vs Thompsons station

  • The percentage of Black residents is the same in both Pearl city and Thompsons station at 2%.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Thompsons station at 84% compared to 10% in Pearl city.
  • The Asian population is larger in Pearl city at 55% compared to 4% in Thompsons station.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Pearl city at 9% compared to 1% in Thompsons station.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Pearl city at 24% compared to 11% in Thompsons station.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Pearl city and Thompsons station at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Pearl city Thompsons station
Mental Health Not Good 12.1% 15.1%
Physical Health Not Good 7.2% 9.3%
Depression 11.1% 24.3%
Smoking 10.4% 13.5%
Binge Drinking 17.8% 17.0%
Obesity 22.3% 29.2%
Disability Percentage 13.0% 5.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Pearl city vs Thompsons station

  • In Thompsons station, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 15.1% compared to 12.1% in Pearl city.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Thompsons station at 24.3% versus 11.1% in Pearl city.
  • Thompsons station has a higher smoking rate at 13.5% compared to 10.4% in Pearl city.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Pearl city at 17.8% compared to 17.0% in Thompsons station.
  • Thompsons station has higher obesity rates at 29.2% compared to 22.3% in Pearl city.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Pearl city at 13.0% compared to 5.0% in Thompsons station.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Pearl city Thompsons station
No Schooling 0.8% (356) 0.6% (51)
High School Diploma 16.9% (7,924) 11.2% (920)
Less than High School 4.2% (1,969) 4.1% (340)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 27.0% (12,639) 33.2% (2,725)

Education Levels Comparison: Pearl city vs Thompsons station

  • A higher percentage of residents in Pearl city have no formal schooling at 0.8% compared to 0.6% in Thompsons station.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Pearl city hold a high school diploma at 16.9% compared to 11.2% in Thompsons station.
  • More residents in Pearl city have less than a high school education at 4.2% compared to 4.1% in Thompsons station.
  • In Thompsons station, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 33.2% compared to 27.0% in Pearl city.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.