Demographics details for Pearisburg, VA vs Roberts, MT
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Pearisburg, VA vs Roberts, MT.
Data | Pearisburg | Roberts |
---|---|---|
Population | 2,832 | 281 |
Median Age | 46.5 years | 39.5 years |
Median Income | $70,905 | $76,688 |
Married Families | 43.0% | 31.0% |
Poverty Level | 10% | 9% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 3.2 |
Population Comparison: Pearisburg vs Roberts
- In Pearisburg, the population is higher at 2,832, compared to 281 in Roberts.
- Residents in Pearisburg have a higher median age of 46.5 years compared to 39.5 years in Roberts.
- Roberts has a higher median income of $76,688, compared to $70,905 in Pearisburg.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Pearisburg at 43.0% compared to 31.0% in Roberts.
- Pearisburg has a higher poverty level at 10% compared to 9% in Roberts.
- The unemployment rate in Pearisburg is higher at 3.5%, compared to 3.2% in Roberts.
Demographics
Demographics Pearisburg vs Roberts provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Pearisburg | Roberts |
---|---|---|
Black | 10 | Data is updating |
White | 89 | 92 |
Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 1 | Data is updating |
Two or More Races | Data is updating | 8 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Pearisburg vs Roberts
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Pearisburg at 10% compared to 0% in Roberts.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Roberts at 92% compared to 89% in Pearisburg.
- Both Pearisburg and Roberts have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Pearisburg at 1% compared to 0% in Roberts.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Roberts at 8%, compared to 0% in Pearisburg.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Pearisburg and Roberts at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Pearisburg | Roberts |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 18.2% | 14.7% |
Physical Health Not Good | 12.0% | 9.2% |
Depression | 24.8% | 23.0% |
Smoking | 19.5% | 13.9% |
Binge Drinking | 17.8% | 23.3% |
Obesity | 36.0% | 29.4% |
Disability Percentage | 14.0% | 23.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Pearisburg vs Roberts
- More residents in Pearisburg report poor mental health at 18.2% compared to 14.7% in Roberts.
- Depression is more prevalent in Pearisburg at 24.8% compared to 23.0% in Roberts.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Pearisburg at 19.5% compared to 13.9% in Roberts.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Roberts at 23.3% compared to 17.8% in Pearisburg.
- Obesity rates are higher in Pearisburg at 36.0% compared to 29.4% in Roberts.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Roberts at 23.0% compared to 14.0% in Pearisburg.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Pearisburg | Roberts |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.7% (20) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
High School Diploma | 33.2% (939) | 12.8% (36) |
Less than High School | 7.0% (199) | 15.7% (44) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 15.0% (426) | 19.9% (56) |
Education Levels Comparison: Pearisburg vs Roberts
- A higher percentage of residents in Pearisburg have no formal schooling at 0.7% compared to 0.0% in Roberts.
- A higher percentage of residents in Pearisburg hold a high school diploma at 33.2% compared to 12.8% in Roberts.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Roberts at 15.7%, compared to 7.0% in Pearisburg.
- In Roberts, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 19.9% compared to 15.0% in Pearisburg.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.