Demographics details for Pearisburg, VA vs Gilford, NH
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Pearisburg, VA vs Gilford, NH.
Data | Pearisburg | Gilford |
---|---|---|
Population | 2,832 | 7,194 |
Median Age | 46.5 years | 47.5 years |
Median Income | $70,905 | $75,964 |
Married Families | 43.0% | 0.6% |
Poverty Level | 10% | 6% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 2.2 |
Population Comparison: Pearisburg vs Gilford
- The population in Gilford is higher at 7,194, compared to 2,832 in Pearisburg.
- The median age in Gilford is higher at 47.5 years, compared to 46.5 years in Pearisburg.
- Gilford has a higher median income of $75,964, compared to $70,905 in Pearisburg.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Pearisburg at 43.0% compared to 0.6% in Gilford.
- Pearisburg has a higher poverty level at 10% compared to 6% in Gilford.
- The unemployment rate in Pearisburg is higher at 3.5%, compared to 2.2% in Gilford.
Demographics
Demographics Pearisburg vs Gilford provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Pearisburg | Gilford |
---|---|---|
Black | 10 | 0.5 |
White | 89 | 96.2 |
Asian | Data is updating | 0.7 |
Hispanic | 1 | 1.6 |
Two or More Races | Data is updating | 1.0 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Pearisburg vs Gilford
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Pearisburg at 10% compared to 0.5% in Gilford.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Gilford at 96.2% compared to 89% in Pearisburg.
- In Gilford, the Asian population stands at 0.7%, greater than 0% in Pearisburg.
- Gilford has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 1.6%, compared to 1% in Pearisburg.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Gilford at 1.0%, compared to 0% in Pearisburg.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Pearisburg and Gilford at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Pearisburg | Gilford |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 18.2% | Data is updating% |
Physical Health Not Good | 12.0% | Data is updating% |
Depression | 24.8% | Data is updating% |
Smoking | 19.5% | Data is updating% |
Binge Drinking | 17.8% | Data is updating% |
Obesity | 36.0% | Data is updating% |
Disability Percentage | 14.0% | Data is updating% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Pearisburg vs Gilford
- More residents in Pearisburg report poor mental health at 18.2% compared to 0.0% in Gilford.
- Depression is more prevalent in Pearisburg at 24.8% compared to 0.0% in Gilford.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Pearisburg at 19.5% compared to 0.0% in Gilford.
- Binge drinking is more common in Pearisburg at 17.8% compared to 0.0% in Gilford.
- Obesity rates are higher in Pearisburg at 36.0% compared to 0.0% in Gilford.
- Disability percentages are higher in Pearisburg at 14.0% compared to 0.0% in Gilford.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Pearisburg | Gilford |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.7% (20) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
High School Diploma | 33.2% (939) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
Less than High School | 7.0% (199) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 15.0% (426) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
Education Levels Comparison: Pearisburg vs Gilford
- A higher percentage of residents in Pearisburg have no formal schooling at 0.7% compared to 0.0% in Gilford.
- A higher percentage of residents in Pearisburg hold a high school diploma at 33.2% compared to 0.0% in Gilford.
- More residents in Pearisburg have less than a high school education at 7.0% compared to 0.0% in Gilford.
- A higher percentage of residents in Pearisburg hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 15.0% compared to 0.0% in Gilford.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.