Demographics details for Pearisburg, VA vs Churdan, IA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Pearisburg, VA vs Churdan, IA.
| Data | Pearisburg | Churdan |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 2,832 | 363 |
| Median Age | 46.5 years | 28.8 years |
| Median Income | $70,905 | $58,125 |
| Married Families | 43.0% | 49.0% |
| Poverty Level | 10% | 10% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 3.0 |
Population Comparison: Pearisburg vs Churdan
- In Pearisburg, the population is higher at 2,832, compared to 363 in Churdan.
- Residents in Pearisburg have a higher median age of 46.5 years compared to 28.8 years in Churdan.
- Pearisburg has a higher median income of $70,905 compared to $58,125 in Churdan.
- In Churdan, the percentage of married families is higher at 49.0%, compared to 43.0% in Pearisburg.
- The poverty level is identical in both Pearisburg and Churdan at 10%.
- The unemployment rate in Pearisburg is higher at 3.5%, compared to 3.0% in Churdan.
Demographics
Demographics Pearisburg vs Churdan provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Pearisburg | Churdan |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 10 | 1 |
| White | 89 | 87 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 3 |
| Hispanic | 1 | 2 |
| Two or More Races | Data is updating | 5 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 2 |
Demographics Comparison: Pearisburg vs Churdan
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Pearisburg at 10% compared to 1% in Churdan.
- Pearisburg has a higher percentage of White residents at 89% compared to 87% in Churdan.
- In Churdan, the Asian population stands at 3%, greater than 0% in Pearisburg.
- Churdan has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 2%, compared to 1% in Pearisburg.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Churdan at 5%, compared to 0% in Pearisburg.
- In Churdan, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 2%, compared to 0% in Pearisburg.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Pearisburg | Churdan |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.2% | 16.2% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.0% | 10.3% |
| Depression | 24.8% | 19.7% |
| Smoking | 19.5% | 18.3% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.8% | 21.1% |
| Obesity | 36.0% | 36.4% |
| Disability Percentage | 14.0% | 25.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Pearisburg vs Churdan
- More residents in Pearisburg report poor mental health at 18.2% compared to 16.2% in Churdan.
- Depression is more prevalent in Pearisburg at 24.8% compared to 19.7% in Churdan.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Pearisburg at 19.5% compared to 18.3% in Churdan.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Churdan at 21.1% compared to 17.8% in Pearisburg.
- Churdan has higher obesity rates at 36.4% compared to 36.0% in Pearisburg.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Churdan at 25.0% compared to 14.0% in Pearisburg.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Pearisburg | Churdan |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.7% (20) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 33.2% (939) | 30.6% (111) |
| Less than High School | 7.0% (199) | 12.7% (46) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 15.0% (426) | 11.6% (42) |
Education Levels Comparison: Pearisburg vs Churdan
- A higher percentage of residents in Pearisburg have no formal schooling at 0.7% compared to 0.0% in Churdan.
- A higher percentage of residents in Pearisburg hold a high school diploma at 33.2% compared to 30.6% in Churdan.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Churdan at 12.7%, compared to 7.0% in Pearisburg.
- A higher percentage of residents in Pearisburg hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 15.0% compared to 11.6% in Churdan.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.