Demographics details for Peabody, MA vs San leandro, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Peabody, MA vs San leandro, CA.
Data | Peabody | San leandro |
---|---|---|
Population | 53,896 | 86,762 |
Median Age | 46.9 years | 41.5 years |
Median Income | $91,125 | $97,141 |
Married Families | 43.0% | 40.0% |
Poverty Level | 6% | 12% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.7 | 4.8 |
Population Comparison: Peabody vs San leandro
- The population in San leandro is higher at 86,762, compared to 53,896 in Peabody.
- Residents in Peabody have a higher median age of 46.9 years compared to 41.5 years in San leandro.
- San leandro has a higher median income of $97,141, compared to $91,125 in Peabody.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Peabody at 43.0% compared to 40.0% in San leandro.
- The poverty level is higher in San leandro at 12%, compared to 6% in Peabody.
- San leandro has a higher unemployment rate at 4.8% compared to 3.7% in Peabody.
Demographics
Demographics Peabody vs San leandro provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Peabody | San leandro |
---|---|---|
Black | 3 | 11 |
White | 76 | 12 |
Asian | 2 | 36 |
Hispanic | 12 | 29 |
Two or More Races | 7 | 11 |
American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Peabody vs San leandro
- In San leandro, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 11% compared to 3% in Peabody.
- Peabody has a higher percentage of White residents at 76% compared to 12% in San leandro.
- In San leandro, the Asian population stands at 36%, greater than 2% in Peabody.
- San leandro has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 29%, compared to 12% in Peabody.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in San leandro at 11%, compared to 7% in Peabody.
- In San leandro, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Peabody.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Peabody | San leandro |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 17.0% | 15.1% |
Physical Health Not Good | 9.4% | 9.9% |
Depression | 23.9% | 16.8% |
Smoking | 13.9% | 11.1% |
Binge Drinking | 18.2% | 14.6% |
Obesity | 29.5% | 26.7% |
Disability Percentage | 15.0% | 11.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Peabody vs San leandro
- More residents in Peabody report poor mental health at 17.0% compared to 15.1% in San leandro.
- Depression is more prevalent in Peabody at 23.9% compared to 16.8% in San leandro.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Peabody at 13.9% compared to 11.1% in San leandro.
- Binge drinking is more common in Peabody at 18.2% compared to 14.6% in San leandro.
- Obesity rates are higher in Peabody at 29.5% compared to 26.7% in San leandro.
- Disability percentages are higher in Peabody at 15.0% compared to 11.0% in San leandro.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Peabody | San leandro |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 1.3% (684) | 3.5% (2,999) |
High School Diploma | 20.9% (11,254) | 16.2% (14,031) |
Less than High School | 12.4% (6,683) | 17.8% (15,482) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 26.1% (14,060) | 25.2% (21,903) |
Education Levels Comparison: Peabody vs San leandro
- In San leandro, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 3.5% compared to 1.3% in Peabody.
- A higher percentage of residents in Peabody hold a high school diploma at 20.9% compared to 16.2% in San leandro.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in San leandro at 17.8%, compared to 12.4% in Peabody.
- A higher percentage of residents in Peabody hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 26.1% compared to 25.2% in San leandro.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.