Demographics details for Peabody, MA vs Rock falls, IL
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Peabody, MA vs Rock falls, IL.
Data | Peabody | Rock falls |
---|---|---|
Population | 53,896 | 8,620 |
Median Age | 46.9 years | 38.2 years |
Median Income | $91,125 | $48,390 |
Married Families | 43.0% | 30.0% |
Poverty Level | 6% | 13% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.7 | 3.1 |
Population Comparison: Peabody vs Rock falls
- In Peabody, the population is higher at 53,896, compared to 8,620 in Rock falls.
- Residents in Peabody have a higher median age of 46.9 years compared to 38.2 years in Rock falls.
- Peabody has a higher median income of $91,125 compared to $48,390 in Rock falls.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Peabody at 43.0% compared to 30.0% in Rock falls.
- The poverty level is higher in Rock falls at 13%, compared to 6% in Peabody.
- The unemployment rate in Peabody is higher at 3.7%, compared to 3.1% in Rock falls.
Demographics
Demographics Peabody vs Rock falls provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Peabody | Rock falls |
---|---|---|
Black | 3 | Data is updating |
White | 76 | 65 |
Asian | 2 | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 12 | 23 |
Two or More Races | 7 | 12 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Peabody vs Rock falls
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Peabody at 3% compared to 0% in Rock falls.
- Peabody has a higher percentage of White residents at 76% compared to 65% in Rock falls.
- The Asian population is larger in Peabody at 2% compared to 0% in Rock falls.
- Rock falls has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 23%, compared to 12% in Peabody.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Rock falls at 12%, compared to 7% in Peabody.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Peabody and Rock falls at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Peabody | Rock falls |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 17.0% | 17.1% |
Physical Health Not Good | 9.4% | 12.2% |
Depression | 23.9% | 22.9% |
Smoking | 13.9% | 19.7% |
Binge Drinking | 18.2% | 17.9% |
Obesity | 29.5% | 39.1% |
Disability Percentage | 15.0% | 20.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Peabody vs Rock falls
- In Rock falls, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.1% compared to 17.0% in Peabody.
- Depression is more prevalent in Peabody at 23.9% compared to 22.9% in Rock falls.
- Rock falls has a higher smoking rate at 19.7% compared to 13.9% in Peabody.
- Binge drinking is more common in Peabody at 18.2% compared to 17.9% in Rock falls.
- Rock falls has higher obesity rates at 39.1% compared to 29.5% in Peabody.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Rock falls at 20.0% compared to 15.0% in Peabody.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Peabody | Rock falls |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 1.3% (684) | 0.5% (47) |
High School Diploma | 20.9% (11,254) | 22.7% (1,958) |
Less than High School | 12.4% (6,683) | 18.4% (1,586) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 26.1% (14,060) | 10.0% (858) |
Education Levels Comparison: Peabody vs Rock falls
- A higher percentage of residents in Peabody have no formal schooling at 1.3% compared to 0.5% in Rock falls.
- In Rock falls, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 22.7% compared to 20.9% in Peabody.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Rock falls at 18.4%, compared to 12.4% in Peabody.
- A higher percentage of residents in Peabody hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 26.1% compared to 10.0% in Rock falls.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.