Demographics details for Peabody, MA vs Rancho cucamonga, CA

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Peabody, MA vs Rancho cucamonga, CA.

Data Peabody Rancho cucamonga
Population 53,896 176,336
Median Age 46.9 years 37.5 years
Median Income $91,125 $105,534
Married Families 43.0% 42.0%
Poverty Level 6% 11%
Unemployment Rate 3.7 3.8

Population Comparison: Peabody vs Rancho cucamonga

  • The population in Rancho cucamonga is higher at 176,336, compared to 53,896 in Peabody.
  • Residents in Peabody have a higher median age of 46.9 years compared to 37.5 years in Rancho cucamonga.
  • Rancho cucamonga has a higher median income of $105,534, compared to $91,125 in Peabody.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Peabody at 43.0% compared to 42.0% in Rancho cucamonga.
  • The poverty level is higher in Rancho cucamonga at 11%, compared to 6% in Peabody.
  • Rancho cucamonga has a higher unemployment rate at 3.8% compared to 3.7% in Peabody.

Demographics

Demographics Peabody vs Rancho cucamonga provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Peabody Rancho cucamonga
Black 3 9
White 76 22
Asian 2 14
Hispanic 12 39
Two or More Races 7 15
American Indian Data is updating 1

Demographics Comparison: Peabody vs Rancho cucamonga

  • In Rancho cucamonga, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 9% compared to 3% in Peabody.
  • Peabody has a higher percentage of White residents at 76% compared to 22% in Rancho cucamonga.
  • In Rancho cucamonga, the Asian population stands at 14%, greater than 2% in Peabody.
  • Rancho cucamonga has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 39%, compared to 12% in Peabody.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Rancho cucamonga at 15%, compared to 7% in Peabody.
  • In Rancho cucamonga, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Peabody.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Peabody Rancho cucamonga
Mental Health Not Good 17.0% 14.8%
Physical Health Not Good 9.4% 9.8%
Depression 23.9% 17.2%
Smoking 13.9% 10.0%
Binge Drinking 18.2% 16.6%
Obesity 29.5% 33.9%
Disability Percentage 15.0% 9.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Peabody vs Rancho cucamonga

  • More residents in Peabody report poor mental health at 17.0% compared to 14.8% in Rancho cucamonga.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Peabody at 23.9% compared to 17.2% in Rancho cucamonga.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Peabody at 13.9% compared to 10.0% in Rancho cucamonga.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Peabody at 18.2% compared to 16.6% in Rancho cucamonga.
  • Rancho cucamonga has higher obesity rates at 33.9% compared to 29.5% in Peabody.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Peabody at 15.0% compared to 9.0% in Rancho cucamonga.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Peabody Rancho cucamonga
No Schooling 1.3% (684) 1.2% (2,052)
High School Diploma 20.9% (11,254) 11.7% (20,590)
Less than High School 12.4% (6,683) 10.0% (17,566)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 26.1% (14,060) 25.3% (44,534)

Education Levels Comparison: Peabody vs Rancho cucamonga

  • A higher percentage of residents in Peabody have no formal schooling at 1.3% compared to 1.2% in Rancho cucamonga.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Peabody hold a high school diploma at 20.9% compared to 11.7% in Rancho cucamonga.
  • More residents in Peabody have less than a high school education at 12.4% compared to 10.0% in Rancho cucamonga.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Peabody hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 26.1% compared to 25.3% in Rancho cucamonga.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.