Demographics details for Peabody, MA vs New london, OH
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Peabody, MA vs New london, OH.
Data | Peabody | New london |
---|---|---|
Population | 53,896 | 2,386 |
Median Age | 46.9 years | 37.1 years |
Median Income | $91,125 | $50,778 |
Married Families | 43.0% | 41.0% |
Poverty Level | 6% | 12% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.7 | 3.6 |
Population Comparison: Peabody vs New london
- In Peabody, the population is higher at 53,896, compared to 2,386 in New london.
- Residents in Peabody have a higher median age of 46.9 years compared to 37.1 years in New london.
- Peabody has a higher median income of $91,125 compared to $50,778 in New london.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Peabody at 43.0% compared to 41.0% in New london.
- The poverty level is higher in New london at 12%, compared to 6% in Peabody.
- The unemployment rate in Peabody is higher at 3.7%, compared to 3.6% in New london.
Demographics
Demographics Peabody vs New london provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Peabody | New london |
---|---|---|
Black | 3 | 2 |
White | 76 | 93 |
Asian | 2 | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 12 | 1 |
Two or More Races | 7 | 4 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Peabody vs New london
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Peabody at 3% compared to 2% in New london.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in New london at 93% compared to 76% in Peabody.
- The Asian population is larger in Peabody at 2% compared to 0% in New london.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Peabody at 12% compared to 1% in New london.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Peabody at 7% compared to 4% in New london.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Peabody and New london at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Peabody | New london |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 17.0% | 19.7% |
Physical Health Not Good | 9.4% | 14.3% |
Depression | 23.9% | 26.4% |
Smoking | 13.9% | 25.2% |
Binge Drinking | 18.2% | 18.4% |
Obesity | 29.5% | 44.0% |
Disability Percentage | 15.0% | 18.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Peabody vs New london
- In New london, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.7% compared to 17.0% in Peabody.
- Higher depression rates are seen in New london at 26.4% versus 23.9% in Peabody.
- New london has a higher smoking rate at 25.2% compared to 13.9% in Peabody.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in New london at 18.4% compared to 18.2% in Peabody.
- New london has higher obesity rates at 44.0% compared to 29.5% in Peabody.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in New london at 18.0% compared to 15.0% in Peabody.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Peabody | New london |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 1.3% (684) | 0.4% (9) |
High School Diploma | 20.9% (11,254) | 29.3% (698) |
Less than High School | 12.4% (6,683) | 18.7% (447) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 26.1% (14,060) | 5.2% (124) |
Education Levels Comparison: Peabody vs New london
- A higher percentage of residents in Peabody have no formal schooling at 1.3% compared to 0.4% in New london.
- In New london, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 29.3% compared to 20.9% in Peabody.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in New london at 18.7%, compared to 12.4% in Peabody.
- A higher percentage of residents in Peabody hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 26.1% compared to 5.2% in New london.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.