Demographics details for Peabody, MA vs Munfordville, KY
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Peabody, MA vs Munfordville, KY.
Data | Peabody | Munfordville |
---|---|---|
Population | 53,896 | 1,701 |
Median Age | 46.9 years | 41.1 years |
Median Income | $91,125 | $26,953 |
Married Families | 43.0% | 22.0% |
Poverty Level | 6% | 18% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.7 | 4.0 |
Population Comparison: Peabody vs Munfordville
- In Peabody, the population is higher at 53,896, compared to 1,701 in Munfordville.
- Residents in Peabody have a higher median age of 46.9 years compared to 41.1 years in Munfordville.
- Peabody has a higher median income of $91,125 compared to $26,953 in Munfordville.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Peabody at 43.0% compared to 22.0% in Munfordville.
- The poverty level is higher in Munfordville at 18%, compared to 6% in Peabody.
- Munfordville has a higher unemployment rate at 4.0% compared to 3.7% in Peabody.
Demographics
Demographics Peabody vs Munfordville provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Peabody | Munfordville |
---|---|---|
Black | 3 | 9 |
White | 76 | 82 |
Asian | 2 | 3 |
Hispanic | 12 | 2 |
Two or More Races | 7 | 4 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Peabody vs Munfordville
- In Munfordville, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 9% compared to 3% in Peabody.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Munfordville at 82% compared to 76% in Peabody.
- In Munfordville, the Asian population stands at 3%, greater than 2% in Peabody.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Peabody at 12% compared to 2% in Munfordville.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Peabody at 7% compared to 4% in Munfordville.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Peabody and Munfordville at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Peabody | Munfordville |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 17.0% | 21.6% |
Physical Health Not Good | 9.4% | 17.2% |
Depression | 23.9% | 30.0% |
Smoking | 13.9% | 28.7% |
Binge Drinking | 18.2% | 13.7% |
Obesity | 29.5% | 39.8% |
Disability Percentage | 15.0% | 26.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Peabody vs Munfordville
- In Munfordville, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 21.6% compared to 17.0% in Peabody.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Munfordville at 30.0% versus 23.9% in Peabody.
- Munfordville has a higher smoking rate at 28.7% compared to 13.9% in Peabody.
- Binge drinking is more common in Peabody at 18.2% compared to 13.7% in Munfordville.
- Munfordville has higher obesity rates at 39.8% compared to 29.5% in Peabody.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Munfordville at 26.0% compared to 15.0% in Peabody.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Peabody | Munfordville |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 1.3% (684) | 0.5% (8) |
High School Diploma | 20.9% (11,254) | 23.9% (407) |
Less than High School | 12.4% (6,683) | 34.5% (587) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 26.1% (14,060) | 7.6% (129) |
Education Levels Comparison: Peabody vs Munfordville
- A higher percentage of residents in Peabody have no formal schooling at 1.3% compared to 0.5% in Munfordville.
- In Munfordville, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 23.9% compared to 20.9% in Peabody.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Munfordville at 34.5%, compared to 12.4% in Peabody.
- A higher percentage of residents in Peabody hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 26.1% compared to 7.6% in Munfordville.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.