Demographics details for Peabody, MA vs Aulander, NC
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Peabody, MA vs Aulander, NC.
| Data | Peabody | Aulander |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 53,896 | 727 |
| Median Age | 46.9 years | 42.4 years |
| Median Income | $91,125 | $33,250 |
| Married Families | 43.0% | 23.0% |
| Poverty Level | 6% | 14% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.7 | 6.1 |
Population Comparison: Peabody vs Aulander
- In Peabody, the population is higher at 53,896, compared to 727 in Aulander.
- Residents in Peabody have a higher median age of 46.9 years compared to 42.4 years in Aulander.
- Peabody has a higher median income of $91,125 compared to $33,250 in Aulander.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Peabody at 43.0% compared to 23.0% in Aulander.
- The poverty level is higher in Aulander at 14%, compared to 6% in Peabody.
- Aulander has a higher unemployment rate at 6.1% compared to 3.7% in Peabody.
Demographics
Demographics Peabody vs Aulander provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Peabody | Aulander |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 3 | 61 |
| White | 76 | 38 |
| Asian | 2 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 12 | Data is updating |
| Two or More Races | 7 | 1 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Peabody vs Aulander
- In Aulander, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 61% compared to 3% in Peabody.
- Peabody has a higher percentage of White residents at 76% compared to 38% in Aulander.
- The Asian population is larger in Peabody at 2% compared to 0% in Aulander.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Peabody at 12% compared to 0% in Aulander.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Peabody at 7% compared to 1% in Aulander.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Peabody and Aulander at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Peabody | Aulander |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.0% | 19.2% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 9.4% | 14.7% |
| Depression | 23.9% | 23.5% |
| Smoking | 13.9% | 23.9% |
| Binge Drinking | 18.2% | 14.2% |
| Obesity | 29.5% | 44.9% |
| Disability Percentage | 15.0% | 16.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Peabody vs Aulander
- In Aulander, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.2% compared to 17.0% in Peabody.
- Depression is more prevalent in Peabody at 23.9% compared to 23.5% in Aulander.
- Aulander has a higher smoking rate at 23.9% compared to 13.9% in Peabody.
- Binge drinking is more common in Peabody at 18.2% compared to 14.2% in Aulander.
- Aulander has higher obesity rates at 44.9% compared to 29.5% in Peabody.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Aulander at 16.0% compared to 15.0% in Peabody.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Peabody | Aulander |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.3% (684) | 0.4% (3) |
| High School Diploma | 20.9% (11,254) | 13.3% (97) |
| Less than High School | 12.4% (6,683) | 28.5% (207) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 26.1% (14,060) | 2.9% (21) |
Education Levels Comparison: Peabody vs Aulander
- A higher percentage of residents in Peabody have no formal schooling at 1.3% compared to 0.4% in Aulander.
- A higher percentage of residents in Peabody hold a high school diploma at 20.9% compared to 13.3% in Aulander.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Aulander at 28.5%, compared to 12.4% in Peabody.
- A higher percentage of residents in Peabody hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 26.1% compared to 2.9% in Aulander.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.