Demographics details for Pea ridge, AR vs Franklin, TX
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Pea ridge, AR vs Franklin, TX.
| Data | Pea ridge | Franklin |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 7,852 | 10,618 |
| Median Age | 35.6 years | 42.9 years |
| Median Income | $93,113 | $67,915 |
| Married Families | 42.0% | 42.0% |
| Poverty Level | 8% | 12% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 4.6 |
Population Comparison: Pea ridge vs Franklin
- The population in Franklin is higher at 10,618, compared to 7,852 in Pea ridge.
- The median age in Franklin is higher at 42.9 years, compared to 35.6 years in Pea ridge.
- Pea ridge has a higher median income of $93,113 compared to $67,915 in Franklin.
- The percentage of married families is the same in both Pea ridge and Franklin at 42.0%.
- The poverty level is higher in Franklin at 12%, compared to 8% in Pea ridge.
- Franklin has a higher unemployment rate at 4.6% compared to 3.5% in Pea ridge.
Demographics
Demographics Pea ridge vs Franklin provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Pea ridge | Franklin |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 4 | 4 |
| White | 70 | 69 |
| Asian | 1 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 9 | 15 |
| Two or More Races | 15 | 12 |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Pea ridge vs Franklin
- The percentage of Black residents is the same in both Pea ridge and Franklin at 4%.
- Pea ridge has a higher percentage of White residents at 70% compared to 69% in Franklin.
- The Asian population is larger in Pea ridge at 1% compared to 0% in Franklin.
- Franklin has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 15%, compared to 9% in Pea ridge.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Pea ridge at 15% compared to 12% in Franklin.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Pea ridge at 1% compared to 0% in Franklin.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Pea ridge | Franklin |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.0% | 16.3% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.7% | 10.3% |
| Depression | 25.0% | 23.5% |
| Smoking | 17.9% | 14.8% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.0% | 19.8% |
| Obesity | 34.8% | 33.2% |
| Disability Percentage | 12.0% | 15.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Pea ridge vs Franklin
- More residents in Pea ridge report poor mental health at 18.0% compared to 16.3% in Franklin.
- Depression is more prevalent in Pea ridge at 25.0% compared to 23.5% in Franklin.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Pea ridge at 17.9% compared to 14.8% in Franklin.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Franklin at 19.8% compared to 17.0% in Pea ridge.
- Obesity rates are higher in Pea ridge at 34.8% compared to 33.2% in Franklin.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Franklin at 15.0% compared to 12.0% in Pea ridge.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Pea ridge | Franklin |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.3% (23) | 0.5% (51) |
| High School Diploma | 17.7% (1,390) | 15.0% (1,588) |
| Less than High School | 9.8% (773) | 11.3% (1,197) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 14.4% (1,131) | 21.2% (2,251) |
Education Levels Comparison: Pea ridge vs Franklin
- In Franklin, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.5% compared to 0.3% in Pea ridge.
- A higher percentage of residents in Pea ridge hold a high school diploma at 17.7% compared to 15.0% in Franklin.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Franklin at 11.3%, compared to 9.8% in Pea ridge.
- In Franklin, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 21.2% compared to 14.4% in Pea ridge.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.