Demographics details for Pea ridge, AR vs Fort washington, MD
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Pea ridge, AR vs Fort washington, MD.
| Data | Pea ridge | Fort washington |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 7,852 | 25,825 |
| Median Age | 35.6 years | 44.1 years |
| Median Income | $93,113 | $143,623 |
| Married Families | 42.0% | 43.0% |
| Poverty Level | 8% | 5% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Pea ridge vs Fort washington
- The population in Fort washington is higher at 25,825, compared to 7,852 in Pea ridge.
- The median age in Fort washington is higher at 44.1 years, compared to 35.6 years in Pea ridge.
- Fort washington has a higher median income of $143,623, compared to $93,113 in Pea ridge.
- In Fort washington, the percentage of married families is higher at 43.0%, compared to 42.0% in Pea ridge.
- Pea ridge has a higher poverty level at 8% compared to 5% in Fort washington.
- The unemployment rate is the same in both Pea ridge and Fort washington at 3.5%.
Demographics
Demographics Pea ridge vs Fort washington provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Pea ridge | Fort washington |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 4 | 61 |
| White | 70 | 8 |
| Asian | 1 | 8 |
| Hispanic | 9 | 17 |
| Two or More Races | 15 | 6 |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Pea ridge vs Fort washington
- In Fort washington, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 61% compared to 4% in Pea ridge.
- Pea ridge has a higher percentage of White residents at 70% compared to 8% in Fort washington.
- In Fort washington, the Asian population stands at 8%, greater than 1% in Pea ridge.
- Fort washington has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 17%, compared to 9% in Pea ridge.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Pea ridge at 15% compared to 6% in Fort washington.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Pea ridge at 1% compared to 0% in Fort washington.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Pea ridge | Fort washington |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.0% | 12.5% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.7% | 7.9% |
| Depression | 25.0% | 11.6% |
| Smoking | 17.9% | 9.6% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.0% | 12.0% |
| Obesity | 34.8% | 37.7% |
| Disability Percentage | 12.0% | 9.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Pea ridge vs Fort washington
- More residents in Pea ridge report poor mental health at 18.0% compared to 12.5% in Fort washington.
- Depression is more prevalent in Pea ridge at 25.0% compared to 11.6% in Fort washington.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Pea ridge at 17.9% compared to 9.6% in Fort washington.
- Binge drinking is more common in Pea ridge at 17.0% compared to 12.0% in Fort washington.
- Fort washington has higher obesity rates at 37.7% compared to 34.8% in Pea ridge.
- Disability percentages are higher in Pea ridge at 12.0% compared to 9.0% in Fort washington.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Pea ridge | Fort washington |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.3% (23) | 1.2% (297) |
| High School Diploma | 17.7% (1,390) | 14.4% (3,710) |
| Less than High School | 9.8% (773) | 8.3% (2,138) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 14.4% (1,131) | 31.8% (8,208) |
Education Levels Comparison: Pea ridge vs Fort washington
- In Fort washington, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.2% compared to 0.3% in Pea ridge.
- A higher percentage of residents in Pea ridge hold a high school diploma at 17.7% compared to 14.4% in Fort washington.
- More residents in Pea ridge have less than a high school education at 9.8% compared to 8.3% in Fort washington.
- In Fort washington, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 31.8% compared to 14.4% in Pea ridge.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.