Demographics details for Pea ridge, AR vs Covington, KY
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Pea ridge, AR vs Covington, KY.
| Data | Pea ridge | Covington |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 7,852 | 40,956 |
| Median Age | 35.6 years | 37.8 years |
| Median Income | $93,113 | $53,770 |
| Married Families | 42.0% | 29.0% |
| Poverty Level | 8% | 14% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 5.2 |
Population Comparison: Pea ridge vs Covington
- The population in Covington is higher at 40,956, compared to 7,852 in Pea ridge.
- The median age in Covington is higher at 37.8 years, compared to 35.6 years in Pea ridge.
- Pea ridge has a higher median income of $93,113 compared to $53,770 in Covington.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Pea ridge at 42.0% compared to 29.0% in Covington.
- The poverty level is higher in Covington at 14%, compared to 8% in Pea ridge.
- Covington has a higher unemployment rate at 5.2% compared to 3.5% in Pea ridge.
Demographics
Demographics Pea ridge vs Covington provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Pea ridge | Covington |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 4 | 10 |
| White | 70 | 76 |
| Asian | 1 | 1 |
| Hispanic | 9 | 8 |
| Two or More Races | 15 | 5 |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Pea ridge vs Covington
- In Covington, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 10% compared to 4% in Pea ridge.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Covington at 76% compared to 70% in Pea ridge.
- Both Pea ridge and Covington have the same percentage of Asian residents at 1%.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Pea ridge at 9% compared to 8% in Covington.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Pea ridge at 15% compared to 5% in Covington.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Pea ridge at 1% compared to 0% in Covington.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Pea ridge | Covington |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.0% | 18.9% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.7% | 14.3% |
| Depression | 25.0% | 27.1% |
| Smoking | 17.9% | 22.9% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.0% | 15.2% |
| Obesity | 34.8% | 38.1% |
| Disability Percentage | 12.0% | 17.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Pea ridge vs Covington
- In Covington, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.9% compared to 18.0% in Pea ridge.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Covington at 27.1% versus 25.0% in Pea ridge.
- Covington has a higher smoking rate at 22.9% compared to 17.9% in Pea ridge.
- Binge drinking is more common in Pea ridge at 17.0% compared to 15.2% in Covington.
- Covington has higher obesity rates at 38.1% compared to 34.8% in Pea ridge.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Covington at 17.0% compared to 12.0% in Pea ridge.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Pea ridge | Covington |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.3% (23) | 1.0% (395) |
| High School Diploma | 17.7% (1,390) | 16.2% (6,618) |
| Less than High School | 9.8% (773) | 18.6% (7,598) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 14.4% (1,131) | 22.0% (8,998) |
Education Levels Comparison: Pea ridge vs Covington
- In Covington, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.0% compared to 0.3% in Pea ridge.
- A higher percentage of residents in Pea ridge hold a high school diploma at 17.7% compared to 16.2% in Covington.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Covington at 18.6%, compared to 9.8% in Pea ridge.
- In Covington, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 22.0% compared to 14.4% in Pea ridge.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.