Demographics details for Paupack, PA vs Limestone, NY
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Paupack, PA vs Limestone, NY.
Data | Paupack | Limestone |
---|---|---|
Population | 1,000 | 426 |
Median Age | 42.0 years | 41.8 years |
Median Income | $60,000 | $39,500 |
Married Families | 300.0% | 46.0% |
Poverty Level | 8% | 12% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.0 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Paupack vs Limestone
- In Paupack, the population is higher at 1,000, compared to 426 in Limestone.
- Residents in Paupack have a higher median age of 42.0 years compared to 41.8 years in Limestone.
- Paupack has a higher median income of $60,000 compared to $39,500 in Limestone.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Paupack at 300.0% compared to 46.0% in Limestone.
- The poverty level is higher in Limestone at 12%, compared to 8% in Paupack.
- Limestone has a higher unemployment rate at 4.5% compared to 4.0% in Paupack.
Demographics
Demographics Paupack vs Limestone provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Paupack | Limestone |
---|---|---|
Black | 2 | 1 |
White | 90 | 97 |
Asian | 5 | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 3 | Data is updating |
Two or More Races | Data is updating | 2 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Paupack vs Limestone
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Paupack at 2% compared to 1% in Limestone.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Limestone at 97% compared to 90% in Paupack.
- The Asian population is larger in Paupack at 5% compared to 0% in Limestone.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Paupack at 3% compared to 0% in Limestone.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Limestone at 2%, compared to 0% in Paupack.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Paupack and Limestone at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Paupack | Limestone |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | Data is updating% | 16.2% |
Physical Health Not Good | Data is updating% | 10.9% |
Depression | Data is updating% | 27.0% |
Smoking | Data is updating% | 18.7% |
Binge Drinking | Data is updating% | 20.4% |
Obesity | Data is updating% | 40.2% |
Disability Percentage | Data is updating% | 19.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Paupack vs Limestone
- In Limestone, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 16.2% compared to 0.0% in Paupack.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Limestone at 27.0% versus 0.0% in Paupack.
- Limestone has a higher smoking rate at 18.7% compared to 0.0% in Paupack.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Limestone at 20.4% compared to 0.0% in Paupack.
- Limestone has higher obesity rates at 40.2% compared to 0.0% in Paupack.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Limestone at 19.0% compared to 0.0% in Paupack.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Paupack | Limestone |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 5.4% (23) |
High School Diploma | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 28.4% (121) |
Less than High School | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 12.7% (54) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 12.4% (53) |
Education Levels Comparison: Paupack vs Limestone
- In Limestone, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 5.4% compared to 0.0% in Paupack.
- In Limestone, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 28.4% compared to 0.0% in Paupack.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Limestone at 12.7%, compared to 0.0% in Paupack.
- In Limestone, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 12.4% compared to 0.0% in Paupack.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.