Demographics details for Paupack, PA vs Cross city, FL
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Paupack, PA vs Cross city, FL.
Data | Paupack | Cross city |
---|---|---|
Population | 1,000 | 1,754 |
Median Age | 42.0 years | 40.2 years |
Median Income | $60,000 | $44,500 |
Married Families | 300.0% | 47.0% |
Poverty Level | 8% | 18% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.0 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Paupack vs Cross city
- The population in Cross city is higher at 1,754, compared to 1,000 in Paupack.
- Residents in Paupack have a higher median age of 42.0 years compared to 40.2 years in Cross city.
- Paupack has a higher median income of $60,000 compared to $44,500 in Cross city.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Paupack at 300.0% compared to 47.0% in Cross city.
- The poverty level is higher in Cross city at 18%, compared to 8% in Paupack.
- The unemployment rate in Paupack is higher at 4.0%, compared to 3.5% in Cross city.
Demographics
Demographics Paupack vs Cross city provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Paupack | Cross city |
---|---|---|
Black | 2 | 20 |
White | 90 | 61 |
Asian | 5 | 2 |
Hispanic | 3 | 9 |
Two or More Races | Data is updating | 8 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Paupack vs Cross city
- In Cross city, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 20% compared to 2% in Paupack.
- Paupack has a higher percentage of White residents at 90% compared to 61% in Cross city.
- The Asian population is larger in Paupack at 5% compared to 2% in Cross city.
- Cross city has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 9%, compared to 3% in Paupack.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Cross city at 8%, compared to 0% in Paupack.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Paupack and Cross city at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Paupack | Cross city |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | Data is updating% | 20.0% |
Physical Health Not Good | Data is updating% | 15.8% |
Depression | Data is updating% | 23.8% |
Smoking | Data is updating% | 29.1% |
Binge Drinking | Data is updating% | 14.8% |
Obesity | Data is updating% | 40.8% |
Disability Percentage | Data is updating% | 32.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Paupack vs Cross city
- In Cross city, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 20.0% compared to 0.0% in Paupack.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Cross city at 23.8% versus 0.0% in Paupack.
- Cross city has a higher smoking rate at 29.1% compared to 0.0% in Paupack.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Cross city at 14.8% compared to 0.0% in Paupack.
- Cross city has higher obesity rates at 40.8% compared to 0.0% in Paupack.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Cross city at 32.0% compared to 0.0% in Paupack.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Paupack | Cross city |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 0.9% (15) |
High School Diploma | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 39.2% (688) |
Less than High School | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 11.7% (205) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 7.8% (136) |
Education Levels Comparison: Paupack vs Cross city
- In Cross city, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.9% compared to 0.0% in Paupack.
- In Cross city, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 39.2% compared to 0.0% in Paupack.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Cross city at 11.7%, compared to 0.0% in Paupack.
- In Cross city, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 7.8% compared to 0.0% in Paupack.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.