Demographics details for Paulden, AZ vs Monroe center, IL
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Paulden, AZ vs Monroe center, IL.
Data | Paulden | Monroe center |
---|---|---|
Population | 4,518 | 410 |
Median Age | 49.5 years | 39.6 years |
Median Income | $65,417 | $86,375 |
Married Families | 44.0% | 56.0% |
Poverty Level | 12% | 5% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Paulden vs Monroe center
- In Paulden, the population is higher at 4,518, compared to 410 in Monroe center.
- Residents in Paulden have a higher median age of 49.5 years compared to 39.6 years in Monroe center.
- Monroe center has a higher median income of $86,375, compared to $65,417 in Paulden.
- In Monroe center, the percentage of married families is higher at 56.0%, compared to 44.0% in Paulden.
- Paulden has a higher poverty level at 12% compared to 5% in Monroe center.
- Monroe center has a higher unemployment rate at 4.5% compared to 3.5% in Paulden.
Demographics
Demographics Paulden vs Monroe center provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Paulden | Monroe center |
---|---|---|
Black | Data is updating | Data is updating |
White | 70 | 96 |
Asian | 1 | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 24 | 2 |
Two or More Races | 4 | 2 |
American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Paulden vs Monroe center
- The percentage of Black residents is the same in both Paulden and Monroe center at 0%.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Monroe center at 96% compared to 70% in Paulden.
- The Asian population is larger in Paulden at 1% compared to 0% in Monroe center.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Paulden at 24% compared to 2% in Monroe center.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Paulden at 4% compared to 2% in Monroe center.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Paulden at 1% compared to 0% in Monroe center.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Paulden | Monroe center |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 19.0% | 16.4% |
Physical Health Not Good | 12.9% | 10.9% |
Depression | 22.8% | 21.7% |
Smoking | 19.7% | 17.3% |
Binge Drinking | 16.3% | 18.7% |
Obesity | 29.4% | 34.5% |
Disability Percentage | 21.0% | 16.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Paulden vs Monroe center
- More residents in Paulden report poor mental health at 19.0% compared to 16.4% in Monroe center.
- Depression is more prevalent in Paulden at 22.8% compared to 21.7% in Monroe center.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Paulden at 19.7% compared to 17.3% in Monroe center.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Monroe center at 18.7% compared to 16.3% in Paulden.
- Monroe center has higher obesity rates at 34.5% compared to 29.4% in Paulden.
- Disability percentages are higher in Paulden at 21.0% compared to 16.0% in Monroe center.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Paulden | Monroe center |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 2.1% (94) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
High School Diploma | 22.8% (1,032) | 20.5% (84) |
Less than High School | 17.7% (798) | 7.8% (32) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 10.2% (461) | 17.1% (70) |
Education Levels Comparison: Paulden vs Monroe center
- A higher percentage of residents in Paulden have no formal schooling at 2.1% compared to 0.0% in Monroe center.
- A higher percentage of residents in Paulden hold a high school diploma at 22.8% compared to 20.5% in Monroe center.
- More residents in Paulden have less than a high school education at 17.7% compared to 7.8% in Monroe center.
- In Monroe center, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 17.1% compared to 10.2% in Paulden.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.