Demographics details for Paulden, AZ vs Fairfield, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Paulden, AZ vs Fairfield, CA.
| Data | Paulden | Fairfield |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 4,518 | 119,338 |
| Median Age | 49.5 years | 35.8 years |
| Median Income | $65,417 | $98,857 |
| Married Families | 44.0% | 39.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | 12% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 5.1 |
Population Comparison: Paulden vs Fairfield
- The population in Fairfield is higher at 119,338, compared to 4,518 in Paulden.
- Residents in Paulden have a higher median age of 49.5 years compared to 35.8 years in Fairfield.
- Fairfield has a higher median income of $98,857, compared to $65,417 in Paulden.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Paulden at 44.0% compared to 39.0% in Fairfield.
- The poverty level is identical in both Paulden and Fairfield at 12%.
- Fairfield has a higher unemployment rate at 5.1% compared to 3.5% in Paulden.
Demographics
Demographics Paulden vs Fairfield provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Paulden | Fairfield |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 15 |
| White | 70 | 23 |
| Asian | 1 | 18 |
| Hispanic | 24 | 30 |
| Two or More Races | 4 | 14 |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Paulden vs Fairfield
- In Fairfield, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 15% compared to 0% in Paulden.
- Paulden has a higher percentage of White residents at 70% compared to 23% in Fairfield.
- In Fairfield, the Asian population stands at 18%, greater than 1% in Paulden.
- Fairfield has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 30%, compared to 24% in Paulden.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Fairfield at 14%, compared to 4% in Paulden.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Paulden at 1% compared to 0% in Fairfield.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Paulden | Fairfield |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 19.0% | 15.8% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.9% | 10.7% |
| Depression | 22.8% | 17.7% |
| Smoking | 19.7% | 11.9% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.3% | 16.1% |
| Obesity | 29.4% | 30.1% |
| Disability Percentage | 21.0% | 12.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Paulden vs Fairfield
- More residents in Paulden report poor mental health at 19.0% compared to 15.8% in Fairfield.
- Depression is more prevalent in Paulden at 22.8% compared to 17.7% in Fairfield.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Paulden at 19.7% compared to 11.9% in Fairfield.
- Binge drinking is more common in Paulden at 16.3% compared to 16.1% in Fairfield.
- Fairfield has higher obesity rates at 30.1% compared to 29.4% in Paulden.
- Disability percentages are higher in Paulden at 21.0% compared to 12.0% in Fairfield.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Paulden | Fairfield |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 2.1% (94) | 2.1% (2,515) |
| High School Diploma | 22.8% (1,032) | 13.7% (16,358) |
| Less than High School | 17.7% (798) | 14.6% (17,464) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 10.2% (461) | 18.3% (21,856) |
Education Levels Comparison: Paulden vs Fairfield
- The percentage of residents with no formal schooling is the same in both Paulden and Fairfield at 2.1%.
- A higher percentage of residents in Paulden hold a high school diploma at 22.8% compared to 13.7% in Fairfield.
- More residents in Paulden have less than a high school education at 17.7% compared to 14.6% in Fairfield.
- In Fairfield, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 18.3% compared to 10.2% in Paulden.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.