Demographics details for Patoka, IL vs Eufaula, AL
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Patoka, IL vs Eufaula, AL.
| Data | Patoka | Eufaula |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 512 | 12,539 |
| Median Age | 39.2 years | 37.0 years |
| Median Income | $69,091 | $39,511 |
| Married Families | 54.0% | 32.0% |
| Poverty Level | 10% | 13% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.0 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Patoka vs Eufaula
- The population in Eufaula is higher at 12,539, compared to 512 in Patoka.
- Residents in Patoka have a higher median age of 39.2 years compared to 37.0 years in Eufaula.
- Patoka has a higher median income of $69,091 compared to $39,511 in Eufaula.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Patoka at 54.0% compared to 32.0% in Eufaula.
- The poverty level is higher in Eufaula at 13%, compared to 10% in Patoka.
- The unemployment rate in Patoka is higher at 5.0%, compared to 3.5% in Eufaula.
Demographics
Demographics Patoka vs Eufaula provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Patoka | Eufaula |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 45 |
| White | 98 | 48 |
| Asian | 1 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | Data is updating | 4 |
| Two or More Races | 1 | 3 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Patoka vs Eufaula
- In Eufaula, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 45% compared to 0% in Patoka.
- Patoka has a higher percentage of White residents at 98% compared to 48% in Eufaula.
- The Asian population is larger in Patoka at 1% compared to 0% in Eufaula.
- Eufaula has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 4%, compared to 0% in Patoka.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Eufaula at 3%, compared to 1% in Patoka.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Patoka and Eufaula at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Patoka | Eufaula |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.8% | 21.5% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.2% | 16.1% |
| Depression | 23.2% | 24.6% |
| Smoking | 17.8% | 24.8% |
| Binge Drinking | 18.6% | 12.6% |
| Obesity | 37.4% | 43.0% |
| Disability Percentage | 21.0% | 19.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Patoka vs Eufaula
- In Eufaula, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 21.5% compared to 16.8% in Patoka.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Eufaula at 24.6% versus 23.2% in Patoka.
- Eufaula has a higher smoking rate at 24.8% compared to 17.8% in Patoka.
- Binge drinking is more common in Patoka at 18.6% compared to 12.6% in Eufaula.
- Eufaula has higher obesity rates at 43.0% compared to 37.4% in Patoka.
- Disability percentages are higher in Patoka at 21.0% compared to 19.0% in Eufaula.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Patoka | Eufaula |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.6% (3) | 1.0% (120) |
| High School Diploma | 32.8% (168) | 19.0% (2,377) |
| Less than High School | 6.6% (34) | 18.0% (2,256) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 11.1% (57) | 11.4% (1,430) |
Education Levels Comparison: Patoka vs Eufaula
- In Eufaula, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.0% compared to 0.6% in Patoka.
- A higher percentage of residents in Patoka hold a high school diploma at 32.8% compared to 19.0% in Eufaula.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Eufaula at 18.0%, compared to 6.6% in Patoka.
- In Eufaula, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 11.4% compared to 11.1% in Patoka.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.