Demographics details for Paterson, NJ vs Sacred heart, MN

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Paterson, NJ vs Sacred heart, MN.

Data Paterson Sacred heart
Population 156,661 498
Median Age 33.1 years 53.5 years
Median Income $52,092 $59,107
Married Families 27.0% 41.0%
Poverty Level 18% 6%
Unemployment Rate 8.8 4.1

Population Comparison: Paterson vs Sacred heart

  • In Paterson, the population is higher at 156,661, compared to 498 in Sacred heart.
  • The median age in Sacred heart is higher at 53.5 years, compared to 33.1 years in Paterson.
  • Sacred heart has a higher median income of $59,107, compared to $52,092 in Paterson.
  • In Sacred heart, the percentage of married families is higher at 41.0%, compared to 27.0% in Paterson.
  • Paterson has a higher poverty level at 18% compared to 6% in Sacred heart.
  • The unemployment rate in Paterson is higher at 8.8%, compared to 4.1% in Sacred heart.

Demographics

Demographics Paterson vs Sacred heart provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Paterson Sacred heart
Black 25 Data is updating
White Data is updating 87
Asian 5 Data is updating
Hispanic 64 13
Two or More Races 17 Data is updating
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Paterson vs Sacred heart

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Paterson at 25% compared to 0% in Sacred heart.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Sacred heart at 87% compared to 0% in Paterson.
  • The Asian population is larger in Paterson at 5% compared to 0% in Sacred heart.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Paterson at 64% compared to 13% in Sacred heart.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Paterson at 17% compared to 0% in Sacred heart.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Paterson and Sacred heart at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Paterson Sacred heart
Mental Health Not Good 17.5% 15.0%
Physical Health Not Good 15.1% 9.6%
Depression 16.5% 23.3%
Smoking 17.7% 17.7%
Binge Drinking 13.9% 19.9%
Obesity 38.0% 37.6%
Disability Percentage 7.0% 25.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Paterson vs Sacred heart

  • More residents in Paterson report poor mental health at 17.5% compared to 15.0% in Sacred heart.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Sacred heart at 23.3% versus 16.5% in Paterson.
  • Smoking rates are the same in both Paterson and Sacred heart at 17.7%.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Sacred heart at 19.9% compared to 13.9% in Paterson.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Paterson at 38.0% compared to 37.6% in Sacred heart.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Sacred heart at 25.0% compared to 7.0% in Paterson.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Paterson Sacred heart
No Schooling 2.1% (3,278) 0.0% (Data is updating)
High School Diploma 25.1% (39,354) 28.1% (140)
Less than High School 26.1% (40,961) 28.5% (142)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 7.9% (12,450) 13.3% (66)

Education Levels Comparison: Paterson vs Sacred heart

  • A higher percentage of residents in Paterson have no formal schooling at 2.1% compared to 0.0% in Sacred heart.
  • In Sacred heart, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 28.1% compared to 25.1% in Paterson.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Sacred heart at 28.5%, compared to 26.1% in Paterson.
  • In Sacred heart, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 13.3% compared to 7.9% in Paterson.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.