Demographics details for Paterson, NJ vs Port arthur, TX
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Paterson, NJ vs Port arthur, TX.
| Data | Paterson | Port arthur |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 156,661 | 55,579 |
| Median Age | 33.1 years | 33.7 years |
| Median Income | $52,092 | $45,357 |
| Married Families | 27.0% | 30.0% |
| Poverty Level | 18% | 23% |
| Unemployment Rate | 8.8 | 11.0 |
Population Comparison: Paterson vs Port arthur
- In Paterson, the population is higher at 156,661, compared to 55,579 in Port arthur.
- The median age in Port arthur is higher at 33.7 years, compared to 33.1 years in Paterson.
- Paterson has a higher median income of $52,092 compared to $45,357 in Port arthur.
- In Port arthur, the percentage of married families is higher at 30.0%, compared to 27.0% in Paterson.
- The poverty level is higher in Port arthur at 23%, compared to 18% in Paterson.
- Port arthur has a higher unemployment rate at 11.0% compared to 8.8% in Paterson.
Demographics
Demographics Paterson vs Port arthur provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Paterson | Port arthur |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 25 | 43 |
| White | Data is updating | 3 |
| Asian | 5 | 6 |
| Hispanic | 64 | 34 |
| Two or More Races | 17 | 13 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Paterson vs Port arthur
- In Port arthur, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 43% compared to 25% in Paterson.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Port arthur at 3% compared to 0% in Paterson.
- In Port arthur, the Asian population stands at 6%, greater than 5% in Paterson.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Paterson at 64% compared to 34% in Port arthur.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Paterson at 17% compared to 13% in Port arthur.
- In Port arthur, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Paterson.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Paterson | Port arthur |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.5% | 19.5% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 15.1% | 15.9% |
| Depression | 16.5% | 20.4% |
| Smoking | 17.7% | 23.3% |
| Binge Drinking | 13.9% | 13.9% |
| Obesity | 38.0% | 42.2% |
| Disability Percentage | 7.0% | 15.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Paterson vs Port arthur
- In Port arthur, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.5% compared to 17.5% in Paterson.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Port arthur at 20.4% versus 16.5% in Paterson.
- Port arthur has a higher smoking rate at 23.3% compared to 17.7% in Paterson.
- Binge drinking rates are similar in both Paterson and Port arthur at 13.9%.
- Port arthur has higher obesity rates at 42.2% compared to 38.0% in Paterson.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Port arthur at 15.0% compared to 7.0% in Paterson.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Paterson | Port arthur |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 2.1% (3,278) | 2.5% (1,383) |
| High School Diploma | 25.1% (39,354) | 19.6% (10,902) |
| Less than High School | 26.1% (40,961) | 23.7% (13,180) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 7.9% (12,450) | 7.1% (3,955) |
Education Levels Comparison: Paterson vs Port arthur
- In Port arthur, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.5% compared to 2.1% in Paterson.
- A higher percentage of residents in Paterson hold a high school diploma at 25.1% compared to 19.6% in Port arthur.
- More residents in Paterson have less than a high school education at 26.1% compared to 23.7% in Port arthur.
- A higher percentage of residents in Paterson hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 7.9% compared to 7.1% in Port arthur.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.