Demographics details for Paterson, NJ vs Navajo dam, NM
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Paterson, NJ vs Navajo dam, NM.
| Data | Paterson | Navajo dam |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 156,661 | 330 |
| Median Age | 33.1 years | 36.6 years |
| Median Income | $52,092 | $63,375 |
| Married Families | 27.0% | 34.0% |
| Poverty Level | 18% | 14% |
| Unemployment Rate | 8.8 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Paterson vs Navajo dam
- In Paterson, the population is higher at 156,661, compared to 330 in Navajo dam.
- The median age in Navajo dam is higher at 36.6 years, compared to 33.1 years in Paterson.
- Navajo dam has a higher median income of $63,375, compared to $52,092 in Paterson.
- In Navajo dam, the percentage of married families is higher at 34.0%, compared to 27.0% in Paterson.
- Paterson has a higher poverty level at 18% compared to 14% in Navajo dam.
- The unemployment rate in Paterson is higher at 8.8%, compared to 3.5% in Navajo dam.
Demographics
Demographics Paterson vs Navajo dam provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Paterson | Navajo dam |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 25 | Data is updating |
| White | Data is updating | 16 |
| Asian | 5 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 64 | 67 |
| Two or More Races | 17 | 11 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 6 |
Demographics Comparison: Paterson vs Navajo dam
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Paterson at 25% compared to 0% in Navajo dam.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Navajo dam at 16% compared to 0% in Paterson.
- The Asian population is larger in Paterson at 5% compared to 0% in Navajo dam.
- Navajo dam has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 67%, compared to 64% in Paterson.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Paterson at 17% compared to 11% in Navajo dam.
- In Navajo dam, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 6%, compared to 0% in Paterson.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Paterson | Navajo dam |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.5% | 15.2% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 15.1% | 11.2% |
| Depression | 16.5% | 17.8% |
| Smoking | 17.7% | 15.0% |
| Binge Drinking | 13.9% | 14.1% |
| Obesity | 38.0% | 32.6% |
| Disability Percentage | 7.0% | 14.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Paterson vs Navajo dam
- More residents in Paterson report poor mental health at 17.5% compared to 15.2% in Navajo dam.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Navajo dam at 17.8% versus 16.5% in Paterson.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Paterson at 17.7% compared to 15.0% in Navajo dam.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Navajo dam at 14.1% compared to 13.9% in Paterson.
- Obesity rates are higher in Paterson at 38.0% compared to 32.6% in Navajo dam.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Navajo dam at 14.0% compared to 7.0% in Paterson.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Paterson | Navajo dam |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 2.1% (3,278) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 25.1% (39,354) | 4.8% (16) |
| Less than High School | 26.1% (40,961) | 6.1% (20) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 7.9% (12,450) | 22.7% (75) |
Education Levels Comparison: Paterson vs Navajo dam
- A higher percentage of residents in Paterson have no formal schooling at 2.1% compared to 0.0% in Navajo dam.
- A higher percentage of residents in Paterson hold a high school diploma at 25.1% compared to 4.8% in Navajo dam.
- More residents in Paterson have less than a high school education at 26.1% compared to 6.1% in Navajo dam.
- In Navajo dam, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 22.7% compared to 7.9% in Paterson.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.