Demographics details for Paterson, NJ vs Hobbs, NM
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Paterson, NJ vs Hobbs, NM.
| Data | Paterson | Hobbs |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 156,661 | 39,648 |
| Median Age | 33.1 years | 30.8 years |
| Median Income | $52,092 | $63,804 |
| Married Families | 27.0% | 32.0% |
| Poverty Level | 18% | 15% |
| Unemployment Rate | 8.8 | 4.9 |
Population Comparison: Paterson vs Hobbs
- In Paterson, the population is higher at 156,661, compared to 39,648 in Hobbs.
- Residents in Paterson have a higher median age of 33.1 years compared to 30.8 years in Hobbs.
- Hobbs has a higher median income of $63,804, compared to $52,092 in Paterson.
- In Hobbs, the percentage of married families is higher at 32.0%, compared to 27.0% in Paterson.
- Paterson has a higher poverty level at 18% compared to 15% in Hobbs.
- The unemployment rate in Paterson is higher at 8.8%, compared to 4.9% in Hobbs.
Demographics
Demographics Paterson vs Hobbs provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Paterson | Hobbs |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 25 | 6 |
| White | Data is updating | 4 |
| Asian | 5 | 1 |
| Hispanic | 64 | 63 |
| Two or More Races | 17 | 25 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Paterson vs Hobbs
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Paterson at 25% compared to 6% in Hobbs.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Hobbs at 4% compared to 0% in Paterson.
- The Asian population is larger in Paterson at 5% compared to 1% in Hobbs.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Paterson at 64% compared to 63% in Hobbs.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Hobbs at 25%, compared to 17% in Paterson.
- In Hobbs, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Paterson.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Paterson | Hobbs |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.5% | 17.1% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 15.1% | 13.3% |
| Depression | 16.5% | 20.6% |
| Smoking | 17.7% | 17.7% |
| Binge Drinking | 13.9% | 15.4% |
| Obesity | 38.0% | 41.7% |
| Disability Percentage | 7.0% | 11.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Paterson vs Hobbs
- More residents in Paterson report poor mental health at 17.5% compared to 17.1% in Hobbs.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Hobbs at 20.6% versus 16.5% in Paterson.
- Smoking rates are the same in both Paterson and Hobbs at 17.7%.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Hobbs at 15.4% compared to 13.9% in Paterson.
- Hobbs has higher obesity rates at 41.7% compared to 38.0% in Paterson.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Hobbs at 11.0% compared to 7.0% in Paterson.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Paterson | Hobbs |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 2.1% (3,278) | 2.2% (856) |
| High School Diploma | 25.1% (39,354) | 15.9% (6,312) |
| Less than High School | 26.1% (40,961) | 26.2% (10,381) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 7.9% (12,450) | 9.2% (3,667) |
Education Levels Comparison: Paterson vs Hobbs
- In Hobbs, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.2% compared to 2.1% in Paterson.
- A higher percentage of residents in Paterson hold a high school diploma at 25.1% compared to 15.9% in Hobbs.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Hobbs at 26.2%, compared to 26.1% in Paterson.
- In Hobbs, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 9.2% compared to 7.9% in Paterson.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.