Demographics details for Pasadena, TX vs Roaring river, NC
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Pasadena, TX vs Roaring river, NC.
| Data | Pasadena | Roaring river |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 147,662 | 1,000 |
| Median Age | 32.6 years | 35.0 years |
| Median Income | $64,698 | $60,000 |
| Married Families | 37.0% | 500.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | 12% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.9 | 4.0 |
Population Comparison: Pasadena vs Roaring river
- In Pasadena, the population is higher at 147,662, compared to 1,000 in Roaring river.
- The median age in Roaring river is higher at 35.0 years, compared to 32.6 years in Pasadena.
- Pasadena has a higher median income of $64,698 compared to $60,000 in Roaring river.
- In Roaring river, the percentage of married families is higher at 500.0%, compared to 37.0% in Pasadena.
- The poverty level is identical in both Pasadena and Roaring river at 12%.
- The unemployment rate in Pasadena is higher at 5.9%, compared to 4.0% in Roaring river.
Demographics
Demographics Pasadena vs Roaring river provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Pasadena | Roaring river |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 3 | 5 |
| White | -1 | 90 |
| Asian | 2 | 2 |
| Hispanic | 72 | 2 |
| Two or More Races | 23 | 1 |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Pasadena vs Roaring river
- In Roaring river, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 5% compared to 3% in Pasadena.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Roaring river at 90% compared to -1% in Pasadena.
- Both Pasadena and Roaring river have the same percentage of Asian residents at 2%.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Pasadena at 72% compared to 2% in Roaring river.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Pasadena at 23% compared to 1% in Roaring river.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Pasadena at 1% compared to 0% in Roaring river.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Pasadena | Roaring river |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.6% | Data is updating% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 13.3% | Data is updating% |
| Depression | 21.7% | Data is updating% |
| Smoking | 18.0% | Data is updating% |
| Binge Drinking | 18.1% | Data is updating% |
| Obesity | 37.9% | Data is updating% |
| Disability Percentage | 11.0% | Data is updating% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Pasadena vs Roaring river
- More residents in Pasadena report poor mental health at 17.6% compared to 0.0% in Roaring river.
- Depression is more prevalent in Pasadena at 21.7% compared to 0.0% in Roaring river.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Pasadena at 18.0% compared to 0.0% in Roaring river.
- Binge drinking is more common in Pasadena at 18.1% compared to 0.0% in Roaring river.
- Obesity rates are higher in Pasadena at 37.9% compared to 0.0% in Roaring river.
- Disability percentages are higher in Pasadena at 11.0% compared to 0.0% in Roaring river.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Pasadena | Roaring river |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 3.0% (4,357) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 16.2% (23,948) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| Less than High School | 33.1% (48,806) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 9.9% (14,596) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
Education Levels Comparison: Pasadena vs Roaring river
- A higher percentage of residents in Pasadena have no formal schooling at 3.0% compared to 0.0% in Roaring river.
- A higher percentage of residents in Pasadena hold a high school diploma at 16.2% compared to 0.0% in Roaring river.
- More residents in Pasadena have less than a high school education at 33.1% compared to 0.0% in Roaring river.
- A higher percentage of residents in Pasadena hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 9.9% compared to 0.0% in Roaring river.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.