Demographics details for Pasadena, TX vs Los angeles, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Pasadena, TX vs Los angeles, CA.
| Data | Pasadena | Los angeles |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 147,662 | 3,822,238 |
| Median Age | 32.6 years | 36.5 years |
| Median Income | $64,698 | $76,244 |
| Married Families | 37.0% | 33.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | 17% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.9 | 6.0 |
Population Comparison: Pasadena vs Los angeles
- The population in Los angeles is higher at 3,822,238, compared to 147,662 in Pasadena.
- The median age in Los angeles is higher at 36.5 years, compared to 32.6 years in Pasadena.
- Los angeles has a higher median income of $76,244, compared to $64,698 in Pasadena.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Pasadena at 37.0% compared to 33.0% in Los angeles.
- The poverty level is higher in Los angeles at 17%, compared to 12% in Pasadena.
- Los angeles has a higher unemployment rate at 6.0% compared to 5.9% in Pasadena.
Demographics
Demographics Pasadena vs Los angeles provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Pasadena | Los angeles |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 3 | 9 |
| White | -1 | 16 |
| Asian | 2 | 12 |
| Hispanic | 72 | 49 |
| Two or More Races | 23 | 13 |
| American Indian | 1 | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Pasadena vs Los angeles
- In Los angeles, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 9% compared to 3% in Pasadena.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Los angeles at 16% compared to -1% in Pasadena.
- In Los angeles, the Asian population stands at 12%, greater than 2% in Pasadena.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Pasadena at 72% compared to 49% in Los angeles.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Pasadena at 23% compared to 13% in Los angeles.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Pasadena and Los angeles at 1%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Pasadena | Los angeles |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.6% | 15.8% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 13.3% | 12.0% |
| Depression | 21.7% | 16.1% |
| Smoking | 18.0% | 11.8% |
| Binge Drinking | 18.1% | 14.9% |
| Obesity | 37.9% | 29.5% |
| Disability Percentage | 11.0% | 10.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Pasadena vs Los angeles
- More residents in Pasadena report poor mental health at 17.6% compared to 15.8% in Los angeles.
- Depression is more prevalent in Pasadena at 21.7% compared to 16.1% in Los angeles.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Pasadena at 18.0% compared to 11.8% in Los angeles.
- Binge drinking is more common in Pasadena at 18.1% compared to 14.9% in Los angeles.
- Obesity rates are higher in Pasadena at 37.9% compared to 29.5% in Los angeles.
- Disability percentages are higher in Pasadena at 11.0% compared to 10.0% in Los angeles.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Pasadena | Los angeles |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 3.0% (4,357) | 3.0% (116,335) |
| High School Diploma | 16.2% (23,948) | 12.1% (461,986) |
| Less than High School | 33.1% (48,806) | 28.8% (1,101,987) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 9.9% (14,596) | 26.2% (1,002,780) |
Education Levels Comparison: Pasadena vs Los angeles
- The percentage of residents with no formal schooling is the same in both Pasadena and Los angeles at 3.0%.
- A higher percentage of residents in Pasadena hold a high school diploma at 16.2% compared to 12.1% in Los angeles.
- More residents in Pasadena have less than a high school education at 33.1% compared to 28.8% in Los angeles.
- In Los angeles, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 26.2% compared to 9.9% in Pasadena.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.