Demographics details for Pasadena, TX vs Fairborn, OH
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Pasadena, TX vs Fairborn, OH.
| Data | Pasadena | Fairborn |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 147,662 | 34,977 |
| Median Age | 32.6 years | 35.1 years |
| Median Income | $64,698 | $53,783 |
| Married Families | 37.0% | 33.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | 9% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.9 | 5.1 |
Population Comparison: Pasadena vs Fairborn
- In Pasadena, the population is higher at 147,662, compared to 34,977 in Fairborn.
- The median age in Fairborn is higher at 35.1 years, compared to 32.6 years in Pasadena.
- Pasadena has a higher median income of $64,698 compared to $53,783 in Fairborn.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Pasadena at 37.0% compared to 33.0% in Fairborn.
- Pasadena has a higher poverty level at 12% compared to 9% in Fairborn.
- The unemployment rate in Pasadena is higher at 5.9%, compared to 5.1% in Fairborn.
Demographics
Demographics Pasadena vs Fairborn provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Pasadena | Fairborn |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 3 | 9 |
| White | -1 | 78 |
| Asian | 2 | 1 |
| Hispanic | 72 | 4 |
| Two or More Races | 23 | 8 |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Pasadena vs Fairborn
- In Fairborn, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 9% compared to 3% in Pasadena.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Fairborn at 78% compared to -1% in Pasadena.
- The Asian population is larger in Pasadena at 2% compared to 1% in Fairborn.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Pasadena at 72% compared to 4% in Fairborn.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Pasadena at 23% compared to 8% in Fairborn.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Pasadena at 1% compared to 0% in Fairborn.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Pasadena | Fairborn |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.6% | 18.3% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 13.3% | 12.4% |
| Depression | 21.7% | 23.4% |
| Smoking | 18.0% | 20.5% |
| Binge Drinking | 18.1% | 16.3% |
| Obesity | 37.9% | 39.7% |
| Disability Percentage | 11.0% | 16.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Pasadena vs Fairborn
- In Fairborn, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.3% compared to 17.6% in Pasadena.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Fairborn at 23.4% versus 21.7% in Pasadena.
- Fairborn has a higher smoking rate at 20.5% compared to 18.0% in Pasadena.
- Binge drinking is more common in Pasadena at 18.1% compared to 16.3% in Fairborn.
- Fairborn has higher obesity rates at 39.7% compared to 37.9% in Pasadena.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Fairborn at 16.0% compared to 11.0% in Pasadena.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Pasadena | Fairborn |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 3.0% (4,357) | 0.3% (116) |
| High School Diploma | 16.2% (23,948) | 13.2% (4,620) |
| Less than High School | 33.1% (48,806) | 12.5% (4,382) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 9.9% (14,596) | 19.4% (6,782) |
Education Levels Comparison: Pasadena vs Fairborn
- A higher percentage of residents in Pasadena have no formal schooling at 3.0% compared to 0.3% in Fairborn.
- A higher percentage of residents in Pasadena hold a high school diploma at 16.2% compared to 13.2% in Fairborn.
- More residents in Pasadena have less than a high school education at 33.1% compared to 12.5% in Fairborn.
- In Fairborn, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 19.4% compared to 9.9% in Pasadena.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.