Demographics details for Pasadena, MD vs Richlands, NC
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Pasadena, MD vs Richlands, NC.
| Data | Pasadena | Richlands |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 32,161 | 2,355 |
| Median Age | 35.1 years | 28.9 years |
| Median Income | $113,944 | $59,333 |
| Married Families | 43.0% | 41.0% |
| Poverty Level | 6% | 9% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Pasadena vs Richlands
- In Pasadena, the population is higher at 32,161, compared to 2,355 in Richlands.
- Residents in Pasadena have a higher median age of 35.1 years compared to 28.9 years in Richlands.
- Pasadena has a higher median income of $113,944 compared to $59,333 in Richlands.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Pasadena at 43.0% compared to 41.0% in Richlands.
- The poverty level is higher in Richlands at 9%, compared to 6% in Pasadena.
- The unemployment rate is the same in both Pasadena and Richlands at 4.5%.
Demographics
Demographics Pasadena vs Richlands provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Pasadena | Richlands |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 17 | 17 |
| White | 66 | 65 |
| Asian | 4 | 1 |
| Hispanic | 7 | 10 |
| Two or More Races | 6 | 7 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Pasadena vs Richlands
- The percentage of Black residents is the same in both Pasadena and Richlands at 17%.
- Pasadena has a higher percentage of White residents at 66% compared to 65% in Richlands.
- The Asian population is larger in Pasadena at 4% compared to 1% in Richlands.
- Richlands has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 10%, compared to 7% in Pasadena.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Richlands at 7%, compared to 6% in Pasadena.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Pasadena and Richlands at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Pasadena | Richlands |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.4% | 16.5% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 9.3% | 10.7% |
| Depression | 21.4% | 23.5% |
| Smoking | 13.2% | 16.6% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.8% | 17.4% |
| Obesity | 35.6% | 36.7% |
| Disability Percentage | 10.0% | 11.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Pasadena vs Richlands
- In Richlands, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 16.5% compared to 15.4% in Pasadena.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Richlands at 23.5% versus 21.4% in Pasadena.
- Richlands has a higher smoking rate at 16.6% compared to 13.2% in Pasadena.
- Binge drinking is more common in Pasadena at 17.8% compared to 17.4% in Richlands.
- Richlands has higher obesity rates at 36.7% compared to 35.6% in Pasadena.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Richlands at 11.0% compared to 10.0% in Pasadena.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Pasadena | Richlands |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.6% (191) | 0.8% (20) |
| High School Diploma | 17.5% (5,624) | 18.9% (445) |
| Less than High School | 8.8% (2,835) | 11.6% (273) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 23.8% (7,658) | 17.3% (408) |
Education Levels Comparison: Pasadena vs Richlands
- In Richlands, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.8% compared to 0.6% in Pasadena.
- In Richlands, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 18.9% compared to 17.5% in Pasadena.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Richlands at 11.6%, compared to 8.8% in Pasadena.
- A higher percentage of residents in Pasadena hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 23.8% compared to 17.3% in Richlands.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.