Demographics details for Pasadena, MD vs Carthage, MS
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Pasadena, MD vs Carthage, MS.
| Data | Pasadena | Carthage |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 32,161 | 4,813 |
| Median Age | 35.1 years | 36.4 years |
| Median Income | $113,944 | $47,722 |
| Married Families | 43.0% | 23.0% |
| Poverty Level | 6% | 15% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 4.2 |
Population Comparison: Pasadena vs Carthage
- In Pasadena, the population is higher at 32,161, compared to 4,813 in Carthage.
- The median age in Carthage is higher at 36.4 years, compared to 35.1 years in Pasadena.
- Pasadena has a higher median income of $113,944 compared to $47,722 in Carthage.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Pasadena at 43.0% compared to 23.0% in Carthage.
- The poverty level is higher in Carthage at 15%, compared to 6% in Pasadena.
- The unemployment rate in Pasadena is higher at 4.5%, compared to 4.2% in Carthage.
Demographics
Demographics Pasadena vs Carthage provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Pasadena | Carthage |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 17 | 45 |
| White | 66 | 36 |
| Asian | 4 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 7 | 18 |
| Two or More Races | 6 | Data is updating |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Pasadena vs Carthage
- In Carthage, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 45% compared to 17% in Pasadena.
- Pasadena has a higher percentage of White residents at 66% compared to 36% in Carthage.
- The Asian population is larger in Pasadena at 4% compared to 0% in Carthage.
- Carthage has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 18%, compared to 7% in Pasadena.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Pasadena at 6% compared to 0% in Carthage.
- In Carthage, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Pasadena.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Pasadena | Carthage |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.4% | 19.0% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 9.3% | 15.8% |
| Depression | 21.4% | 21.6% |
| Smoking | 13.2% | 25.3% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.8% | 12.5% |
| Obesity | 35.6% | 46.5% |
| Disability Percentage | 10.0% | 23.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Pasadena vs Carthage
- In Carthage, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.0% compared to 15.4% in Pasadena.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Carthage at 21.6% versus 21.4% in Pasadena.
- Carthage has a higher smoking rate at 25.3% compared to 13.2% in Pasadena.
- Binge drinking is more common in Pasadena at 17.8% compared to 12.5% in Carthage.
- Carthage has higher obesity rates at 46.5% compared to 35.6% in Pasadena.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Carthage at 23.0% compared to 10.0% in Pasadena.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Pasadena | Carthage |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.6% (191) | 3.0% (145) |
| High School Diploma | 17.5% (5,624) | 16.7% (806) |
| Less than High School | 8.8% (2,835) | 16.9% (811) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 23.8% (7,658) | 12.1% (583) |
Education Levels Comparison: Pasadena vs Carthage
- In Carthage, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 3.0% compared to 0.6% in Pasadena.
- A higher percentage of residents in Pasadena hold a high school diploma at 17.5% compared to 16.7% in Carthage.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Carthage at 16.9%, compared to 8.8% in Pasadena.
- A higher percentage of residents in Pasadena hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 23.8% compared to 12.1% in Carthage.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.