Demographics details for Parsons, KS vs White house, TN
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Parsons, KS vs White house, TN.
| Data | Parsons | White house |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 9,382 | 14,516 |
| Median Age | 38.0 years | 36.5 years |
| Median Income | $48,990 | $85,404 |
| Married Families | 34.0% | 46.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | 7% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 3.4 |
Population Comparison: Parsons vs White house
- The population in White house is higher at 14,516, compared to 9,382 in Parsons.
- Residents in Parsons have a higher median age of 38.0 years compared to 36.5 years in White house.
- White house has a higher median income of $85,404, compared to $48,990 in Parsons.
- In White house, the percentage of married families is higher at 46.0%, compared to 34.0% in Parsons.
- Parsons has a higher poverty level at 12% compared to 7% in White house.
- The unemployment rate in Parsons is higher at 3.5%, compared to 3.4% in White house.
Demographics
Demographics Parsons vs White house provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Parsons | White house |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 8 | 2 |
| White | 79 | 87 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 1 |
| Hispanic | 7 | 4 |
| Two or More Races | 6 | 6 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Parsons vs White house
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Parsons at 8% compared to 2% in White house.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in White house at 87% compared to 79% in Parsons.
- In White house, the Asian population stands at 1%, greater than 0% in Parsons.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Parsons at 7% compared to 4% in White house.
- Both Parsons and White house have the same percentage of residents identifying as two or more races at 6%.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Parsons and White house at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Parsons | White house |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.4% | 17.5% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.7% | 11.0% |
| Depression | 22.3% | 27.6% |
| Smoking | 22.4% | 17.7% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.3% | 16.7% |
| Obesity | 45.2% | 32.5% |
| Disability Percentage | 23.0% | 11.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Parsons vs White house
- More residents in Parsons report poor mental health at 18.4% compared to 17.5% in White house.
- Higher depression rates are seen in White house at 27.6% versus 22.3% in Parsons.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Parsons at 22.4% compared to 17.7% in White house.
- Binge drinking is more common in Parsons at 17.3% compared to 16.7% in White house.
- Obesity rates are higher in Parsons at 45.2% compared to 32.5% in White house.
- Disability percentages are higher in Parsons at 23.0% compared to 11.0% in White house.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Parsons | White house |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.2% (113) | 0.2% (30) |
| High School Diploma | 15.2% (1,423) | 18.0% (2,617) |
| Less than High School | 11.6% (1,093) | 12.4% (1,794) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 17.3% (1,621) | 15.4% (2,235) |
Education Levels Comparison: Parsons vs White house
- A higher percentage of residents in Parsons have no formal schooling at 1.2% compared to 0.2% in White house.
- In White house, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 18.0% compared to 15.2% in Parsons.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in White house at 12.4%, compared to 11.6% in Parsons.
- A higher percentage of residents in Parsons hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 17.3% compared to 15.4% in White house.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.