Demographics details for Parsons, KS vs Shasta lake, CA

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Parsons, KS vs Shasta lake, CA.

Data Parsons Shasta lake
Population 9,382 10,335
Median Age 38.0 years 38.8 years
Median Income $48,990 $54,490
Married Families 34.0% 35.0%
Poverty Level 12% 12%
Unemployment Rate 3.5 5.1

Population Comparison: Parsons vs Shasta lake

  • The population in Shasta lake is higher at 10,335, compared to 9,382 in Parsons.
  • The median age in Shasta lake is higher at 38.8 years, compared to 38.0 years in Parsons.
  • Shasta lake has a higher median income of $54,490, compared to $48,990 in Parsons.
  • In Shasta lake, the percentage of married families is higher at 35.0%, compared to 34.0% in Parsons.
  • The poverty level is identical in both Parsons and Shasta lake at 12%.
  • Shasta lake has a higher unemployment rate at 5.1% compared to 3.5% in Parsons.

Demographics

Demographics Parsons vs Shasta lake provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Parsons Shasta lake
Black 8 Data is updating
White 79 74
Asian Data is updating 1
Hispanic 7 12
Two or More Races 6 11
American Indian Data is updating 2

Demographics Comparison: Parsons vs Shasta lake

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Parsons at 8% compared to 0% in Shasta lake.
  • Parsons has a higher percentage of White residents at 79% compared to 74% in Shasta lake.
  • In Shasta lake, the Asian population stands at 1%, greater than 0% in Parsons.
  • Shasta lake has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 12%, compared to 7% in Parsons.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Shasta lake at 11%, compared to 6% in Parsons.
  • In Shasta lake, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 2%, compared to 0% in Parsons.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Parsons Shasta lake
Mental Health Not Good 18.4% 19.3%
Physical Health Not Good 12.7% 13.2%
Depression 22.3% 22.9%
Smoking 22.4% 17.4%
Binge Drinking 17.3% 17.5%
Obesity 45.2% 32.5%
Disability Percentage 23.0% 25.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Parsons vs Shasta lake

  • In Shasta lake, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.3% compared to 18.4% in Parsons.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Shasta lake at 22.9% versus 22.3% in Parsons.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Parsons at 22.4% compared to 17.4% in Shasta lake.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Shasta lake at 17.5% compared to 17.3% in Parsons.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Parsons at 45.2% compared to 32.5% in Shasta lake.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Shasta lake at 25.0% compared to 23.0% in Parsons.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Parsons Shasta lake
No Schooling 1.2% (113) 0.6% (67)
High School Diploma 15.2% (1,423) 17.0% (1,759)
Less than High School 11.6% (1,093) 11.4% (1,176)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 17.3% (1,621) 9.2% (946)

Education Levels Comparison: Parsons vs Shasta lake

  • A higher percentage of residents in Parsons have no formal schooling at 1.2% compared to 0.6% in Shasta lake.
  • In Shasta lake, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 17.0% compared to 15.2% in Parsons.
  • More residents in Parsons have less than a high school education at 11.6% compared to 11.4% in Shasta lake.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Parsons hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 17.3% compared to 9.2% in Shasta lake.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.