Demographics details for Parsons, KS vs Randleman, NC
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Parsons, KS vs Randleman, NC.
| Data | Parsons | Randleman |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 9,382 | 4,642 |
| Median Age | 38.0 years | 33.5 years |
| Median Income | $48,990 | $63,040 |
| Married Families | 34.0% | 38.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | 10% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Parsons vs Randleman
- In Parsons, the population is higher at 9,382, compared to 4,642 in Randleman.
- Residents in Parsons have a higher median age of 38.0 years compared to 33.5 years in Randleman.
- Randleman has a higher median income of $63,040, compared to $48,990 in Parsons.
- In Randleman, the percentage of married families is higher at 38.0%, compared to 34.0% in Parsons.
- Parsons has a higher poverty level at 12% compared to 10% in Randleman.
- The unemployment rate is the same in both Parsons and Randleman at 3.5%.
Demographics
Demographics Parsons vs Randleman provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Parsons | Randleman |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 8 | 4 |
| White | 79 | 77 |
| Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 7 | 9 |
| Two or More Races | 6 | 8 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 2 |
Demographics Comparison: Parsons vs Randleman
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Parsons at 8% compared to 4% in Randleman.
- Parsons has a higher percentage of White residents at 79% compared to 77% in Randleman.
- Both Parsons and Randleman have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- Randleman has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 9%, compared to 7% in Parsons.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Randleman at 8%, compared to 6% in Parsons.
- In Randleman, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 2%, compared to 0% in Parsons.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Parsons | Randleman |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.4% | 17.6% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.7% | 12.0% |
| Depression | 22.3% | 25.7% |
| Smoking | 22.4% | 19.4% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.3% | 17.7% |
| Obesity | 45.2% | 37.5% |
| Disability Percentage | 23.0% | 21.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Parsons vs Randleman
- More residents in Parsons report poor mental health at 18.4% compared to 17.6% in Randleman.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Randleman at 25.7% versus 22.3% in Parsons.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Parsons at 22.4% compared to 19.4% in Randleman.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Randleman at 17.7% compared to 17.3% in Parsons.
- Obesity rates are higher in Parsons at 45.2% compared to 37.5% in Randleman.
- Disability percentages are higher in Parsons at 23.0% compared to 21.0% in Randleman.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Parsons | Randleman |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.2% (113) | 0.3% (16) |
| High School Diploma | 15.2% (1,423) | 16.5% (768) |
| Less than High School | 11.6% (1,093) | 22.1% (1,026) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 17.3% (1,621) | 6.9% (320) |
Education Levels Comparison: Parsons vs Randleman
- A higher percentage of residents in Parsons have no formal schooling at 1.2% compared to 0.3% in Randleman.
- In Randleman, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 16.5% compared to 15.2% in Parsons.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Randleman at 22.1%, compared to 11.6% in Parsons.
- A higher percentage of residents in Parsons hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 17.3% compared to 6.9% in Randleman.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.