Demographics details for Parsons, KS vs Raeford, NC
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Parsons, KS vs Raeford, NC.
Data | Parsons | Raeford |
---|---|---|
Population | 9,382 | 4,529 |
Median Age | 38.0 years | 38.5 years |
Median Income | $48,990 | $38,371 |
Married Families | 34.0% | 27.0% |
Poverty Level | 12% | 20% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 4.2 |
Population Comparison: Parsons vs Raeford
- In Parsons, the population is higher at 9,382, compared to 4,529 in Raeford.
- The median age in Raeford is higher at 38.5 years, compared to 38.0 years in Parsons.
- Parsons has a higher median income of $48,990 compared to $38,371 in Raeford.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Parsons at 34.0% compared to 27.0% in Raeford.
- The poverty level is higher in Raeford at 20%, compared to 12% in Parsons.
- Raeford has a higher unemployment rate at 4.2% compared to 3.5% in Parsons.
Demographics
Demographics Parsons vs Raeford provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Parsons | Raeford |
---|---|---|
Black | 8 | 46 |
White | 79 | 30 |
Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 7 | 8 |
Two or More Races | 6 | 10 |
American Indian | Data is updating | 6 |
Demographics Comparison: Parsons vs Raeford
- In Raeford, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 46% compared to 8% in Parsons.
- Parsons has a higher percentage of White residents at 79% compared to 30% in Raeford.
- Both Parsons and Raeford have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- Raeford has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 8%, compared to 7% in Parsons.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Raeford at 10%, compared to 6% in Parsons.
- In Raeford, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 6%, compared to 0% in Parsons.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Parsons | Raeford |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 18.4% | 18.3% |
Physical Health Not Good | 12.7% | 14.1% |
Depression | 22.3% | 23.7% |
Smoking | 22.4% | 22.1% |
Binge Drinking | 17.3% | 14.7% |
Obesity | 45.2% | 41.7% |
Disability Percentage | 23.0% | 26.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Parsons vs Raeford
- More residents in Parsons report poor mental health at 18.4% compared to 18.3% in Raeford.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Raeford at 23.7% versus 22.3% in Parsons.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Parsons at 22.4% compared to 22.1% in Raeford.
- Binge drinking is more common in Parsons at 17.3% compared to 14.7% in Raeford.
- Obesity rates are higher in Parsons at 45.2% compared to 41.7% in Raeford.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Raeford at 26.0% compared to 23.0% in Parsons.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Parsons | Raeford |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 1.2% (113) | 1.0% (46) |
High School Diploma | 15.2% (1,423) | 19.1% (866) |
Less than High School | 11.6% (1,093) | 17.0% (768) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 17.3% (1,621) | 13.2% (599) |
Education Levels Comparison: Parsons vs Raeford
- A higher percentage of residents in Parsons have no formal schooling at 1.2% compared to 1.0% in Raeford.
- In Raeford, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 19.1% compared to 15.2% in Parsons.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Raeford at 17.0%, compared to 11.6% in Parsons.
- A higher percentage of residents in Parsons hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 17.3% compared to 13.2% in Raeford.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.