Demographics details for Parsons, KS vs Pocahontas, AR
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Parsons, KS vs Pocahontas, AR.
| Data | Parsons | Pocahontas |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 9,382 | 7,546 |
| Median Age | 38.0 years | 36.5 years |
| Median Income | $48,990 | $38,912 |
| Married Families | 34.0% | 37.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | 19% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Parsons vs Pocahontas
- In Parsons, the population is higher at 9,382, compared to 7,546 in Pocahontas.
- Residents in Parsons have a higher median age of 38.0 years compared to 36.5 years in Pocahontas.
- Parsons has a higher median income of $48,990 compared to $38,912 in Pocahontas.
- In Pocahontas, the percentage of married families is higher at 37.0%, compared to 34.0% in Parsons.
- The poverty level is higher in Pocahontas at 19%, compared to 12% in Parsons.
- Pocahontas has a higher unemployment rate at 4.5% compared to 3.5% in Parsons.
Demographics
Demographics Parsons vs Pocahontas provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Parsons | Pocahontas |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 8 | 1 |
| White | 79 | 90 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 1 |
| Hispanic | 7 | 1 |
| Two or More Races | 6 | 7 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Parsons vs Pocahontas
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Parsons at 8% compared to 1% in Pocahontas.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Pocahontas at 90% compared to 79% in Parsons.
- In Pocahontas, the Asian population stands at 1%, greater than 0% in Parsons.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Parsons at 7% compared to 1% in Pocahontas.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Pocahontas at 7%, compared to 6% in Parsons.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Parsons and Pocahontas at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Parsons | Pocahontas |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.4% | 22.0% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.7% | 16.6% |
| Depression | 22.3% | 29.9% |
| Smoking | 22.4% | 27.1% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.3% | 14.1% |
| Obesity | 45.2% | 43.5% |
| Disability Percentage | 23.0% | 22.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Parsons vs Pocahontas
- In Pocahontas, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 22.0% compared to 18.4% in Parsons.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Pocahontas at 29.9% versus 22.3% in Parsons.
- Pocahontas has a higher smoking rate at 27.1% compared to 22.4% in Parsons.
- Binge drinking is more common in Parsons at 17.3% compared to 14.1% in Pocahontas.
- Obesity rates are higher in Parsons at 45.2% compared to 43.5% in Pocahontas.
- Disability percentages are higher in Parsons at 23.0% compared to 22.0% in Pocahontas.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Parsons | Pocahontas |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.2% (113) | 0.5% (40) |
| High School Diploma | 15.2% (1,423) | 19.8% (1,491) |
| Less than High School | 11.6% (1,093) | 15.7% (1,186) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 17.3% (1,621) | 10.4% (782) |
Education Levels Comparison: Parsons vs Pocahontas
- A higher percentage of residents in Parsons have no formal schooling at 1.2% compared to 0.5% in Pocahontas.
- In Pocahontas, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 19.8% compared to 15.2% in Parsons.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Pocahontas at 15.7%, compared to 11.6% in Parsons.
- A higher percentage of residents in Parsons hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 17.3% compared to 10.4% in Pocahontas.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.