Demographics details for Parsons, KS vs Onalaska, TX
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Parsons, KS vs Onalaska, TX.
| Data | Parsons | Onalaska |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 9,382 | 3,205 |
| Median Age | 38.0 years | 45.2 years |
| Median Income | $48,990 | $56,168 |
| Married Families | 34.0% | 35.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | 12% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Parsons vs Onalaska
- In Parsons, the population is higher at 9,382, compared to 3,205 in Onalaska.
- The median age in Onalaska is higher at 45.2 years, compared to 38.0 years in Parsons.
- Onalaska has a higher median income of $56,168, compared to $48,990 in Parsons.
- In Onalaska, the percentage of married families is higher at 35.0%, compared to 34.0% in Parsons.
- The poverty level is identical in both Parsons and Onalaska at 12%.
- Onalaska has a higher unemployment rate at 4.5% compared to 3.5% in Parsons.
Demographics
Demographics Parsons vs Onalaska provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Parsons | Onalaska |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 8 | 1 |
| White | 79 | 91 |
| Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 7 | 3 |
| Two or More Races | 6 | 5 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Parsons vs Onalaska
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Parsons at 8% compared to 1% in Onalaska.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Onalaska at 91% compared to 79% in Parsons.
- Both Parsons and Onalaska have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Parsons at 7% compared to 3% in Onalaska.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Parsons at 6% compared to 5% in Onalaska.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Parsons and Onalaska at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Parsons | Onalaska |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.4% | 19.0% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.7% | 12.5% |
| Depression | 22.3% | 26.0% |
| Smoking | 22.4% | 20.4% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.3% | 19.4% |
| Obesity | 45.2% | 39.9% |
| Disability Percentage | 23.0% | 24.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Parsons vs Onalaska
- In Onalaska, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.0% compared to 18.4% in Parsons.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Onalaska at 26.0% versus 22.3% in Parsons.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Parsons at 22.4% compared to 20.4% in Onalaska.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Onalaska at 19.4% compared to 17.3% in Parsons.
- Obesity rates are higher in Parsons at 45.2% compared to 39.9% in Onalaska.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Onalaska at 24.0% compared to 23.0% in Parsons.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Parsons | Onalaska |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.2% (113) | 0.7% (21) |
| High School Diploma | 15.2% (1,423) | 15.3% (491) |
| Less than High School | 11.6% (1,093) | 21.5% (689) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 17.3% (1,621) | 5.0% (161) |
Education Levels Comparison: Parsons vs Onalaska
- A higher percentage of residents in Parsons have no formal schooling at 1.2% compared to 0.7% in Onalaska.
- In Onalaska, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 15.3% compared to 15.2% in Parsons.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Onalaska at 21.5%, compared to 11.6% in Parsons.
- A higher percentage of residents in Parsons hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 17.3% compared to 5.0% in Onalaska.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.