Demographics details for Parsons, KS vs Minneapolis, MN
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Parsons, KS vs Minneapolis, MN.
Data | Parsons | Minneapolis |
---|---|---|
Population | 9,382 | 425,096 |
Median Age | 38.0 years | 32.8 years |
Median Income | $48,990 | $76,332 |
Married Families | 34.0% | 29.0% |
Poverty Level | 12% | 14% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Parsons vs Minneapolis
- The population in Minneapolis is higher at 425,096, compared to 9,382 in Parsons.
- Residents in Parsons have a higher median age of 38.0 years compared to 32.8 years in Minneapolis.
- Minneapolis has a higher median income of $76,332, compared to $48,990 in Parsons.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Parsons at 34.0% compared to 29.0% in Minneapolis.
- The poverty level is higher in Minneapolis at 14%, compared to 12% in Parsons.
- The unemployment rate is the same in both Parsons and Minneapolis at 3.5%.
Demographics
Demographics Parsons vs Minneapolis provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Parsons | Minneapolis |
---|---|---|
Black | 8 | 19 |
White | 79 | 57 |
Asian | Data is updating | 5 |
Hispanic | 7 | 10 |
Two or More Races | 6 | 8 |
American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Parsons vs Minneapolis
- In Minneapolis, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 19% compared to 8% in Parsons.
- Parsons has a higher percentage of White residents at 79% compared to 57% in Minneapolis.
- In Minneapolis, the Asian population stands at 5%, greater than 0% in Parsons.
- Minneapolis has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 10%, compared to 7% in Parsons.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Minneapolis at 8%, compared to 6% in Parsons.
- In Minneapolis, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Parsons.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Parsons | Minneapolis |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 18.4% | 15.1% |
Physical Health Not Good | 12.7% | 9.0% |
Depression | 22.3% | 23.7% |
Smoking | 22.4% | 14.8% |
Binge Drinking | 17.3% | 19.3% |
Obesity | 45.2% | 30.4% |
Disability Percentage | 23.0% | 11.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Parsons vs Minneapolis
- More residents in Parsons report poor mental health at 18.4% compared to 15.1% in Minneapolis.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Minneapolis at 23.7% versus 22.3% in Parsons.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Parsons at 22.4% compared to 14.8% in Minneapolis.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Minneapolis at 19.3% compared to 17.3% in Parsons.
- Obesity rates are higher in Parsons at 45.2% compared to 30.4% in Minneapolis.
- Disability percentages are higher in Parsons at 23.0% compared to 11.0% in Minneapolis.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Parsons | Minneapolis |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 1.2% (113) | 1.9% (8,224) |
High School Diploma | 15.2% (1,423) | 7.7% (32,570) |
Less than High School | 11.6% (1,093) | 9.0% (38,399) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 17.3% (1,621) | 36.2% (153,769) |
Education Levels Comparison: Parsons vs Minneapolis
- In Minneapolis, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.9% compared to 1.2% in Parsons.
- A higher percentage of residents in Parsons hold a high school diploma at 15.2% compared to 7.7% in Minneapolis.
- More residents in Parsons have less than a high school education at 11.6% compared to 9.0% in Minneapolis.
- In Minneapolis, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 36.2% compared to 17.3% in Parsons.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.