Demographics details for Parsons, KS vs Fleischmanns, NY
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Parsons, KS vs Fleischmanns, NY.
| Data | Parsons | Fleischmanns |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 9,382 | 230 |
| Median Age | 38.0 years | 49.5 years |
| Median Income | $48,990 | $60,417 |
| Married Families | 34.0% | 40.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | 10% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 3.4 |
Population Comparison: Parsons vs Fleischmanns
- In Parsons, the population is higher at 9,382, compared to 230 in Fleischmanns.
- The median age in Fleischmanns is higher at 49.5 years, compared to 38.0 years in Parsons.
- Fleischmanns has a higher median income of $60,417, compared to $48,990 in Parsons.
- In Fleischmanns, the percentage of married families is higher at 40.0%, compared to 34.0% in Parsons.
- Parsons has a higher poverty level at 12% compared to 10% in Fleischmanns.
- The unemployment rate in Parsons is higher at 3.5%, compared to 3.4% in Fleischmanns.
Demographics
Demographics Parsons vs Fleischmanns provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Parsons | Fleischmanns |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 8 | Data is updating |
| White | 79 | 54 |
| Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 7 | 35 |
| Two or More Races | 6 | 7 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 4 |
Demographics Comparison: Parsons vs Fleischmanns
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Parsons at 8% compared to 0% in Fleischmanns.
- Parsons has a higher percentage of White residents at 79% compared to 54% in Fleischmanns.
- Both Parsons and Fleischmanns have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- Fleischmanns has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 35%, compared to 7% in Parsons.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Fleischmanns at 7%, compared to 6% in Parsons.
- In Fleischmanns, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 4%, compared to 0% in Parsons.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Parsons | Fleischmanns |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.4% | 16.6% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.7% | 12.2% |
| Depression | 22.3% | 23.7% |
| Smoking | 22.4% | 19.5% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.3% | 17.0% |
| Obesity | 45.2% | 35.0% |
| Disability Percentage | 23.0% | 24.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Parsons vs Fleischmanns
- More residents in Parsons report poor mental health at 18.4% compared to 16.6% in Fleischmanns.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Fleischmanns at 23.7% versus 22.3% in Parsons.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Parsons at 22.4% compared to 19.5% in Fleischmanns.
- Binge drinking is more common in Parsons at 17.3% compared to 17.0% in Fleischmanns.
- Obesity rates are higher in Parsons at 45.2% compared to 35.0% in Fleischmanns.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Fleischmanns at 24.0% compared to 23.0% in Parsons.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Parsons | Fleischmanns |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.2% (113) | 4.3% (10) |
| High School Diploma | 15.2% (1,423) | 20.0% (46) |
| Less than High School | 11.6% (1,093) | 21.7% (50) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 17.3% (1,621) | 37.0% (85) |
Education Levels Comparison: Parsons vs Fleischmanns
- In Fleischmanns, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 4.3% compared to 1.2% in Parsons.
- In Fleischmanns, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 20.0% compared to 15.2% in Parsons.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Fleischmanns at 21.7%, compared to 11.6% in Parsons.
- In Fleischmanns, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 37.0% compared to 17.3% in Parsons.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.