Demographics details for Parsons, KS vs Deridder, LA

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Parsons, KS vs Deridder, LA.

Data Parsons Deridder
Population 9,382 9,624
Median Age 38.0 years 38.1 years
Median Income $48,990 $56,607
Married Families 34.0% 36.0%
Poverty Level 12% 18%
Unemployment Rate 3.5 4.5

Population Comparison: Parsons vs Deridder

  • The population in Deridder is higher at 9,624, compared to 9,382 in Parsons.
  • The median age in Deridder is higher at 38.1 years, compared to 38.0 years in Parsons.
  • Deridder has a higher median income of $56,607, compared to $48,990 in Parsons.
  • In Deridder, the percentage of married families is higher at 36.0%, compared to 34.0% in Parsons.
  • The poverty level is higher in Deridder at 18%, compared to 12% in Parsons.
  • Deridder has a higher unemployment rate at 4.5% compared to 3.5% in Parsons.

Demographics

Demographics Parsons vs Deridder provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Parsons Deridder
Black 8 32
White 79 49
Asian Data is updating 1
Hispanic 7 7
Two or More Races 6 11
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Parsons vs Deridder

  • In Deridder, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 32% compared to 8% in Parsons.
  • Parsons has a higher percentage of White residents at 79% compared to 49% in Deridder.
  • In Deridder, the Asian population stands at 1%, greater than 0% in Parsons.
  • The percentage of Hispanic residents is the same in both Parsons and Deridder at 7%.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Deridder at 11%, compared to 6% in Parsons.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Parsons and Deridder at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Parsons Deridder
Mental Health Not Good 18.4% 19.0%
Physical Health Not Good 12.7% 13.1%
Depression 22.3% 27.1%
Smoking 22.4% 21.5%
Binge Drinking 17.3% 17.6%
Obesity 45.2% 42.3%
Disability Percentage 23.0% 21.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Parsons vs Deridder

  • In Deridder, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.0% compared to 18.4% in Parsons.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Deridder at 27.1% versus 22.3% in Parsons.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Parsons at 22.4% compared to 21.5% in Deridder.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Deridder at 17.6% compared to 17.3% in Parsons.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Parsons at 45.2% compared to 42.3% in Deridder.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Parsons at 23.0% compared to 21.0% in Deridder.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Parsons Deridder
No Schooling 1.2% (113) 0.7% (67)
High School Diploma 15.2% (1,423) 20.4% (1,963)
Less than High School 11.6% (1,093) 13.7% (1,321)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 17.3% (1,621) 15.6% (1,505)

Education Levels Comparison: Parsons vs Deridder

  • A higher percentage of residents in Parsons have no formal schooling at 1.2% compared to 0.7% in Deridder.
  • In Deridder, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 20.4% compared to 15.2% in Parsons.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Deridder at 13.7%, compared to 11.6% in Parsons.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Parsons hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 17.3% compared to 15.6% in Deridder.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.