Demographics details for Parsons, KS vs Cedar hill, TX

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Parsons, KS vs Cedar hill, TX.

Data Parsons Cedar hill
Population 9,382 48,341
Median Age 38.0 years 35.3 years
Median Income $48,990 $84,132
Married Families 34.0% 38.0%
Poverty Level 12% 9%
Unemployment Rate 3.5 4.9

Population Comparison: Parsons vs Cedar hill

  • The population in Cedar hill is higher at 48,341, compared to 9,382 in Parsons.
  • Residents in Parsons have a higher median age of 38.0 years compared to 35.3 years in Cedar hill.
  • Cedar hill has a higher median income of $84,132, compared to $48,990 in Parsons.
  • In Cedar hill, the percentage of married families is higher at 38.0%, compared to 34.0% in Parsons.
  • Parsons has a higher poverty level at 12% compared to 9% in Cedar hill.
  • Cedar hill has a higher unemployment rate at 4.9% compared to 3.5% in Parsons.

Demographics

Demographics Parsons vs Cedar hill provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Parsons Cedar hill
Black 8 51
White 79 11
Asian Data is updating 2
Hispanic 7 27
Two or More Races 6 9
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Parsons vs Cedar hill

  • In Cedar hill, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 51% compared to 8% in Parsons.
  • Parsons has a higher percentage of White residents at 79% compared to 11% in Cedar hill.
  • In Cedar hill, the Asian population stands at 2%, greater than 0% in Parsons.
  • Cedar hill has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 27%, compared to 7% in Parsons.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Cedar hill at 9%, compared to 6% in Parsons.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Parsons and Cedar hill at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Parsons Cedar hill
Mental Health Not Good 18.4% 16.1%
Physical Health Not Good 12.7% 10.4%
Depression 22.3% 20.5%
Smoking 22.4% 14.8%
Binge Drinking 17.3% 17.7%
Obesity 45.2% 35.9%
Disability Percentage 23.0% 11.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Parsons vs Cedar hill

  • More residents in Parsons report poor mental health at 18.4% compared to 16.1% in Cedar hill.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Parsons at 22.3% compared to 20.5% in Cedar hill.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Parsons at 22.4% compared to 14.8% in Cedar hill.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Cedar hill at 17.7% compared to 17.3% in Parsons.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Parsons at 45.2% compared to 35.9% in Cedar hill.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Parsons at 23.0% compared to 11.0% in Cedar hill.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Parsons Cedar hill
No Schooling 1.2% (113) 1.2% (578)
High School Diploma 15.2% (1,423) 13.4% (6,465)
Less than High School 11.6% (1,093) 10.2% (4,909)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 17.3% (1,621) 18.4% (8,890)

Education Levels Comparison: Parsons vs Cedar hill

  • The percentage of residents with no formal schooling is the same in both Parsons and Cedar hill at 1.2%.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Parsons hold a high school diploma at 15.2% compared to 13.4% in Cedar hill.
  • More residents in Parsons have less than a high school education at 11.6% compared to 10.2% in Cedar hill.
  • In Cedar hill, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 18.4% compared to 17.3% in Parsons.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.