Demographics details for Parsons, KS vs Antlers, OK
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Parsons, KS vs Antlers, OK.
Data | Parsons | Antlers |
---|---|---|
Population | 9,382 | 2,198 |
Median Age | 38.0 years | 36.7 years |
Median Income | $48,990 | $27,798 |
Married Families | 34.0% | 37.0% |
Poverty Level | 12% | 18% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Parsons vs Antlers
- In Parsons, the population is higher at 9,382, compared to 2,198 in Antlers.
- Residents in Parsons have a higher median age of 38.0 years compared to 36.7 years in Antlers.
- Parsons has a higher median income of $48,990 compared to $27,798 in Antlers.
- In Antlers, the percentage of married families is higher at 37.0%, compared to 34.0% in Parsons.
- The poverty level is higher in Antlers at 18%, compared to 12% in Parsons.
- Antlers has a higher unemployment rate at 4.5% compared to 3.5% in Parsons.
Demographics
Demographics Parsons vs Antlers provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Parsons | Antlers |
---|---|---|
Black | 8 | 3 |
White | 79 | 63 |
Asian | Data is updating | 1 |
Hispanic | 7 | 5 |
Two or More Races | 6 | 15 |
American Indian | Data is updating | 13 |
Demographics Comparison: Parsons vs Antlers
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Parsons at 8% compared to 3% in Antlers.
- Parsons has a higher percentage of White residents at 79% compared to 63% in Antlers.
- In Antlers, the Asian population stands at 1%, greater than 0% in Parsons.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Parsons at 7% compared to 5% in Antlers.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Antlers at 15%, compared to 6% in Parsons.
- In Antlers, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 13%, compared to 0% in Parsons.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Parsons | Antlers |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 18.4% | 21.3% |
Physical Health Not Good | 12.7% | 15.6% |
Depression | 22.3% | 28.5% |
Smoking | 22.4% | 26.4% |
Binge Drinking | 17.3% | 14.1% |
Obesity | 45.2% | 40.5% |
Disability Percentage | 23.0% | 36.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Parsons vs Antlers
- In Antlers, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 21.3% compared to 18.4% in Parsons.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Antlers at 28.5% versus 22.3% in Parsons.
- Antlers has a higher smoking rate at 26.4% compared to 22.4% in Parsons.
- Binge drinking is more common in Parsons at 17.3% compared to 14.1% in Antlers.
- Obesity rates are higher in Parsons at 45.2% compared to 40.5% in Antlers.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Antlers at 36.0% compared to 23.0% in Parsons.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Parsons | Antlers |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 1.2% (113) | 1.0% (23) |
High School Diploma | 15.2% (1,423) | 23.4% (515) |
Less than High School | 11.6% (1,093) | 26.2% (575) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 17.3% (1,621) | 10.7% (236) |
Education Levels Comparison: Parsons vs Antlers
- A higher percentage of residents in Parsons have no formal schooling at 1.2% compared to 1.0% in Antlers.
- In Antlers, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 23.4% compared to 15.2% in Parsons.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Antlers at 26.2%, compared to 11.6% in Parsons.
- A higher percentage of residents in Parsons hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 17.3% compared to 10.7% in Antlers.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.