Demographics details for Parnell, MO vs Cedar park, TX
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Parnell, MO vs Cedar park, TX.
| Data | Parnell | Cedar park |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 134 | 77,642 |
| Median Age | 31.5 years | 37.6 years |
| Median Income | $38,393 | $118,903 |
| Married Families | 51.0% | 45.0% |
| Poverty Level | 10% | 5% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.2 | 3.6 |
Population Comparison: Parnell vs Cedar park
- The population in Cedar park is higher at 77,642, compared to 134 in Parnell.
- The median age in Cedar park is higher at 37.6 years, compared to 31.5 years in Parnell.
- Cedar park has a higher median income of $118,903, compared to $38,393 in Parnell.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Parnell at 51.0% compared to 45.0% in Cedar park.
- Parnell has a higher poverty level at 10% compared to 5% in Cedar park.
- Cedar park has a higher unemployment rate at 3.6% compared to 3.2% in Parnell.
Demographics
Demographics Parnell vs Cedar park provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Parnell | Cedar park |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 3 |
| White | 69 | 55 |
| Asian | 1 | 12 |
| Hispanic | 9 | 20 |
| Two or More Races | 21 | 10 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Parnell vs Cedar park
- In Cedar park, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 3% compared to 0% in Parnell.
- Parnell has a higher percentage of White residents at 69% compared to 55% in Cedar park.
- In Cedar park, the Asian population stands at 12%, greater than 1% in Parnell.
- Cedar park has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 20%, compared to 9% in Parnell.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Parnell at 21% compared to 10% in Cedar park.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Parnell and Cedar park at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Parnell | Cedar park |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.5% | 14.9% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 13.3% | 8.8% |
| Depression | 24.2% | 24.1% |
| Smoking | 22.0% | 11.0% |
| Binge Drinking | 18.2% | 17.9% |
| Obesity | 39.7% | 31.0% |
| Disability Percentage | 24.0% | 8.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Parnell vs Cedar park
- More residents in Parnell report poor mental health at 18.5% compared to 14.9% in Cedar park.
- Depression is more prevalent in Parnell at 24.2% compared to 24.1% in Cedar park.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Parnell at 22.0% compared to 11.0% in Cedar park.
- Binge drinking is more common in Parnell at 18.2% compared to 17.9% in Cedar park.
- Obesity rates are higher in Parnell at 39.7% compared to 31.0% in Cedar park.
- Disability percentages are higher in Parnell at 24.0% compared to 8.0% in Cedar park.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Parnell | Cedar park |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 0.4% (287) |
| High School Diploma | 46.3% (62) | 8.9% (6,896) |
| Less than High School | 7.5% (10) | 4.1% (3,156) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 11.2% (15) | 35.8% (27,785) |
Education Levels Comparison: Parnell vs Cedar park
- In Cedar park, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.4% compared to 0.0% in Parnell.
- A higher percentage of residents in Parnell hold a high school diploma at 46.3% compared to 8.9% in Cedar park.
- More residents in Parnell have less than a high school education at 7.5% compared to 4.1% in Cedar park.
- In Cedar park, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 35.8% compared to 11.2% in Parnell.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.