Demographics details for Parksley, VA vs Sanford, ME
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Parksley, VA vs Sanford, ME.
| Data | Parksley | Sanford |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 808 | 22,266 |
| Median Age | 43.6 years | 39.3 years |
| Median Income | $74,844 | $71,848 |
| Married Families | 31.0% | 36.0% |
| Poverty Level | 9% | 8% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 2.7 |
Population Comparison: Parksley vs Sanford
- The population in Sanford is higher at 22,266, compared to 808 in Parksley.
- Residents in Parksley have a higher median age of 43.6 years compared to 39.3 years in Sanford.
- Parksley has a higher median income of $74,844 compared to $71,848 in Sanford.
- In Sanford, the percentage of married families is higher at 36.0%, compared to 31.0% in Parksley.
- Parksley has a higher poverty level at 9% compared to 8% in Sanford.
- The unemployment rate in Parksley is higher at 4.5%, compared to 2.7% in Sanford.
Demographics
Demographics Parksley vs Sanford provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Parksley | Sanford |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 35 | 1 |
| White | 46 | 89 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 2 |
| Hispanic | 13 | 3 |
| Two or More Races | 6 | 5 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Parksley vs Sanford
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Parksley at 35% compared to 1% in Sanford.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Sanford at 89% compared to 46% in Parksley.
- In Sanford, the Asian population stands at 2%, greater than 0% in Parksley.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Parksley at 13% compared to 3% in Sanford.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Parksley at 6% compared to 5% in Sanford.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Parksley and Sanford at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Parksley | Sanford |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.5% | 18.3% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 14.4% | 11.6% |
| Depression | 23.3% | 25.3% |
| Smoking | 22.6% | 18.4% |
| Binge Drinking | 15.6% | 18.2% |
| Obesity | 40.0% | 33.4% |
| Disability Percentage | 10.0% | 16.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Parksley vs Sanford
- More residents in Parksley report poor mental health at 18.5% compared to 18.3% in Sanford.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Sanford at 25.3% versus 23.3% in Parksley.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Parksley at 22.6% compared to 18.4% in Sanford.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Sanford at 18.2% compared to 15.6% in Parksley.
- Obesity rates are higher in Parksley at 40.0% compared to 33.4% in Sanford.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Sanford at 16.0% compared to 10.0% in Parksley.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Parksley | Sanford |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 2.0% (16) | 0.4% (79) |
| High School Diploma | 19.1% (154) | 21.5% (4,797) |
| Less than High School | 22.3% (180) | 12.1% (2,692) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 17.9% (145) | 15.7% (3,505) |
Education Levels Comparison: Parksley vs Sanford
- A higher percentage of residents in Parksley have no formal schooling at 2.0% compared to 0.4% in Sanford.
- In Sanford, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 21.5% compared to 19.1% in Parksley.
- More residents in Parksley have less than a high school education at 22.3% compared to 12.1% in Sanford.
- A higher percentage of residents in Parksley hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 17.9% compared to 15.7% in Sanford.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.