Demographics details for Parksley, VA vs New london, CT
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Parksley, VA vs New london, CT.
| Data | Parksley | New london |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 808 | 27,980 |
| Median Age | 43.6 years | 35.5 years |
| Median Income | $74,844 | $56,237 |
| Married Families | 31.0% | 24.0% |
| Poverty Level | 9% | 12% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 3.6 |
Population Comparison: Parksley vs New london
- The population in New london is higher at 27,980, compared to 808 in Parksley.
- Residents in Parksley have a higher median age of 43.6 years compared to 35.5 years in New london.
- Parksley has a higher median income of $74,844 compared to $56,237 in New london.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Parksley at 31.0% compared to 24.0% in New london.
- The poverty level is higher in New london at 12%, compared to 9% in Parksley.
- The unemployment rate in Parksley is higher at 4.5%, compared to 3.6% in New london.
Demographics
Demographics Parksley vs New london provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Parksley | New london |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 35 | 17 |
| White | 46 | 41 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 2 |
| Hispanic | 13 | 29 |
| Two or More Races | 6 | 11 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Parksley vs New london
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Parksley at 35% compared to 17% in New london.
- Parksley has a higher percentage of White residents at 46% compared to 41% in New london.
- In New london, the Asian population stands at 2%, greater than 0% in Parksley.
- New london has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 29%, compared to 13% in Parksley.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in New london at 11%, compared to 6% in Parksley.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Parksley and New london at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Parksley | New london |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.5% | 17.9% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 14.4% | 12.5% |
| Depression | 23.3% | 23.3% |
| Smoking | 22.6% | 19.5% |
| Binge Drinking | 15.6% | 15.2% |
| Obesity | 40.0% | 37.1% |
| Disability Percentage | 10.0% | 14.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Parksley vs New london
- More residents in Parksley report poor mental health at 18.5% compared to 17.9% in New london.
- Both cities have comparable depression rates at 23.3%.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Parksley at 22.6% compared to 19.5% in New london.
- Binge drinking is more common in Parksley at 15.6% compared to 15.2% in New london.
- Obesity rates are higher in Parksley at 40.0% compared to 37.1% in New london.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in New london at 14.0% compared to 10.0% in Parksley.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Parksley | New london |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 2.0% (16) | 1.4% (399) |
| High School Diploma | 19.1% (154) | 16.0% (4,487) |
| Less than High School | 22.3% (180) | 13.7% (3,830) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 17.9% (145) | 16.9% (4,738) |
Education Levels Comparison: Parksley vs New london
- A higher percentage of residents in Parksley have no formal schooling at 2.0% compared to 1.4% in New london.
- A higher percentage of residents in Parksley hold a high school diploma at 19.1% compared to 16.0% in New london.
- More residents in Parksley have less than a high school education at 22.3% compared to 13.7% in New london.
- A higher percentage of residents in Parksley hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 17.9% compared to 16.9% in New london.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.