Demographics details for Parksley, VA vs Fountain hills, AZ

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Parksley, VA vs Fountain hills, AZ.

Data Parksley Fountain hills
Population 808 23,785
Median Age 43.6 years 60.2 years
Median Income $74,844 $100,317
Married Families 31.0% 58.0%
Poverty Level 9% Data is updating
Unemployment Rate 4.5 3.2

Population Comparison: Parksley vs Fountain hills

  • The population in Fountain hills is higher at 23,785, compared to 808 in Parksley.
  • The median age in Fountain hills is higher at 60.2 years, compared to 43.6 years in Parksley.
  • Fountain hills has a higher median income of $100,317, compared to $74,844 in Parksley.
  • In Fountain hills, the percentage of married families is higher at 58.0%, compared to 31.0% in Parksley.
  • Parksley has a higher poverty level at 9% compared to 0% in Fountain hills.
  • The unemployment rate in Parksley is higher at 4.5%, compared to 3.2% in Fountain hills.

Demographics

Demographics Parksley vs Fountain hills provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Parksley Fountain hills
Black 35 2
White 46 89
Asian Data is updating 2
Hispanic 13 3
Two or More Races 6 4
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Parksley vs Fountain hills

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Parksley at 35% compared to 2% in Fountain hills.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Fountain hills at 89% compared to 46% in Parksley.
  • In Fountain hills, the Asian population stands at 2%, greater than 0% in Parksley.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Parksley at 13% compared to 3% in Fountain hills.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Parksley at 6% compared to 4% in Fountain hills.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Parksley and Fountain hills at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Parksley Fountain hills
Mental Health Not Good 18.5% 15.1%
Physical Health Not Good 14.4% 8.0%
Depression 23.3% 19.7%
Smoking 22.6% 10.7%
Binge Drinking 15.6% 19.8%
Obesity 40.0% 26.5%
Disability Percentage 10.0% 10.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Parksley vs Fountain hills

  • More residents in Parksley report poor mental health at 18.5% compared to 15.1% in Fountain hills.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Parksley at 23.3% compared to 19.7% in Fountain hills.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Parksley at 22.6% compared to 10.7% in Fountain hills.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Fountain hills at 19.8% compared to 15.6% in Parksley.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Parksley at 40.0% compared to 26.5% in Fountain hills.
  • Disability percentages are the same in both Parksley and Fountain hills at 10.0%.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Parksley Fountain hills
No Schooling 2.0% (16) 0.4% (88)
High School Diploma 19.1% (154) 11.7% (2,782)
Less than High School 22.3% (180) 3.7% (876)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 17.9% (145) 42.2% (10,044)

Education Levels Comparison: Parksley vs Fountain hills

  • A higher percentage of residents in Parksley have no formal schooling at 2.0% compared to 0.4% in Fountain hills.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Parksley hold a high school diploma at 19.1% compared to 11.7% in Fountain hills.
  • More residents in Parksley have less than a high school education at 22.3% compared to 3.7% in Fountain hills.
  • In Fountain hills, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 42.2% compared to 17.9% in Parksley.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.