Demographics details for Parksley, VA vs Dixon, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Parksley, VA vs Dixon, CA.
| Data | Parksley | Dixon |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 808 | 19,143 |
| Median Age | 43.6 years | 33.5 years |
| Median Income | $74,844 | $92,138 |
| Married Families | 31.0% | 38.0% |
| Poverty Level | 9% | 10% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 5.2 |
Population Comparison: Parksley vs Dixon
- The population in Dixon is higher at 19,143, compared to 808 in Parksley.
- Residents in Parksley have a higher median age of 43.6 years compared to 33.5 years in Dixon.
- Dixon has a higher median income of $92,138, compared to $74,844 in Parksley.
- In Dixon, the percentage of married families is higher at 38.0%, compared to 31.0% in Parksley.
- The poverty level is higher in Dixon at 10%, compared to 9% in Parksley.
- Dixon has a higher unemployment rate at 5.2% compared to 4.5% in Parksley.
Demographics
Demographics Parksley vs Dixon provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Parksley | Dixon |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 35 | 2 |
| White | 46 | 40 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 3 |
| Hispanic | 13 | 41 |
| Two or More Races | 6 | 14 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Parksley vs Dixon
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Parksley at 35% compared to 2% in Dixon.
- Parksley has a higher percentage of White residents at 46% compared to 40% in Dixon.
- In Dixon, the Asian population stands at 3%, greater than 0% in Parksley.
- Dixon has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 41%, compared to 13% in Parksley.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Dixon at 14%, compared to 6% in Parksley.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Parksley and Dixon at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Parksley | Dixon |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.5% | 16.7% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 14.4% | 11.7% |
| Depression | 23.3% | 19.8% |
| Smoking | 22.6% | 12.9% |
| Binge Drinking | 15.6% | 17.2% |
| Obesity | 40.0% | 31.6% |
| Disability Percentage | 10.0% | 11.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Parksley vs Dixon
- More residents in Parksley report poor mental health at 18.5% compared to 16.7% in Dixon.
- Depression is more prevalent in Parksley at 23.3% compared to 19.8% in Dixon.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Parksley at 22.6% compared to 12.9% in Dixon.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Dixon at 17.2% compared to 15.6% in Parksley.
- Obesity rates are higher in Parksley at 40.0% compared to 31.6% in Dixon.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Dixon at 11.0% compared to 10.0% in Parksley.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Parksley | Dixon |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 2.0% (16) | 2.0% (380) |
| High School Diploma | 19.1% (154) | 15.7% (3,013) |
| Less than High School | 22.3% (180) | 18.1% (3,473) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 17.9% (145) | 14.1% (2,695) |
Education Levels Comparison: Parksley vs Dixon
- The percentage of residents with no formal schooling is the same in both Parksley and Dixon at 2.0%.
- A higher percentage of residents in Parksley hold a high school diploma at 19.1% compared to 15.7% in Dixon.
- More residents in Parksley have less than a high school education at 22.3% compared to 18.1% in Dixon.
- A higher percentage of residents in Parksley hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 17.9% compared to 14.1% in Dixon.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.