Demographics details for Parkman, WY vs Essex junction, VT

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Parkman, WY vs Essex junction, VT.

Data Parkman Essex junction
Population 473 10,917
Median Age 64.0 years 39.9 years
Median Income $61,216 $92,589
Married Families 93.0% 46.0%
Poverty Level 5% 6%
Unemployment Rate 3.0 2.5

Population Comparison: Parkman vs Essex junction

  • The population in Essex junction is higher at 10,917, compared to 473 in Parkman.
  • Residents in Parkman have a higher median age of 64.0 years compared to 39.9 years in Essex junction.
  • Essex junction has a higher median income of $92,589, compared to $61,216 in Parkman.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Parkman at 93.0% compared to 46.0% in Essex junction.
  • The poverty level is higher in Essex junction at 6%, compared to 5% in Parkman.
  • The unemployment rate in Parkman is higher at 3.0%, compared to 2.5% in Essex junction.

Demographics

Demographics Parkman vs Essex junction provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Parkman Essex junction
Black Data is updating 3
White 100 79
Asian Data is updating 8
Hispanic Data is updating 2
Two or More Races Data is updating 8
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Parkman vs Essex junction

  • In Essex junction, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 3% compared to 0% in Parkman.
  • Parkman has a higher percentage of White residents at 100% compared to 79% in Essex junction.
  • In Essex junction, the Asian population stands at 8%, greater than 0% in Parkman.
  • Essex junction has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 2%, compared to 0% in Parkman.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Essex junction at 8%, compared to 0% in Parkman.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Parkman and Essex junction at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Parkman Essex junction
Mental Health Not Good 14.9% 15.1%
Physical Health Not Good 9.8% 8.1%
Depression 20.5% 27.1%
Smoking 16.9% 11.8%
Binge Drinking 19.5% 20.9%
Obesity 30.3% 26.4%
Disability Percentage 39.0% 11.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Parkman vs Essex junction

  • In Essex junction, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 15.1% compared to 14.9% in Parkman.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Essex junction at 27.1% versus 20.5% in Parkman.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Parkman at 16.9% compared to 11.8% in Essex junction.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Essex junction at 20.9% compared to 19.5% in Parkman.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Parkman at 30.3% compared to 26.4% in Essex junction.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Parkman at 39.0% compared to 11.0% in Essex junction.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Parkman Essex junction
No Schooling 0.0% (Data is updating) 1.5% (162)
High School Diploma 20.9% (99) 8.2% (899)
Less than High School 9.3% (44) 8.8% (966)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 32.1% (152) 34.3% (3,742)

Education Levels Comparison: Parkman vs Essex junction

  • In Essex junction, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.5% compared to 0.0% in Parkman.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Parkman hold a high school diploma at 20.9% compared to 8.2% in Essex junction.
  • More residents in Parkman have less than a high school education at 9.3% compared to 8.8% in Essex junction.
  • In Essex junction, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 34.3% compared to 32.1% in Parkman.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.