Demographics details for Parkman, WY vs Clarksville, AR

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Parkman, WY vs Clarksville, AR.

Data Parkman Clarksville
Population 473 9,555
Median Age 64.0 years 35.3 years
Median Income $61,216 $35,911
Married Families 93.0% 36.0%
Poverty Level 5% 18%
Unemployment Rate 3.0 4.5

Population Comparison: Parkman vs Clarksville

  • The population in Clarksville is higher at 9,555, compared to 473 in Parkman.
  • Residents in Parkman have a higher median age of 64.0 years compared to 35.3 years in Clarksville.
  • Parkman has a higher median income of $61,216 compared to $35,911 in Clarksville.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Parkman at 93.0% compared to 36.0% in Clarksville.
  • The poverty level is higher in Clarksville at 18%, compared to 5% in Parkman.
  • Clarksville has a higher unemployment rate at 4.5% compared to 3.0% in Parkman.

Demographics

Demographics Parkman vs Clarksville provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Parkman Clarksville
Black Data is updating 3
White 100 60
Asian Data is updating 6
Hispanic Data is updating 23
Two or More Races Data is updating 7
American Indian Data is updating 1

Demographics Comparison: Parkman vs Clarksville

  • In Clarksville, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 3% compared to 0% in Parkman.
  • Parkman has a higher percentage of White residents at 100% compared to 60% in Clarksville.
  • In Clarksville, the Asian population stands at 6%, greater than 0% in Parkman.
  • Clarksville has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 23%, compared to 0% in Parkman.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Clarksville at 7%, compared to 0% in Parkman.
  • In Clarksville, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Parkman.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Parkman Clarksville
Mental Health Not Good 14.9% 21.0%
Physical Health Not Good 9.8% 16.3%
Depression 20.5% 27.9%
Smoking 16.9% 24.5%
Binge Drinking 19.5% 13.9%
Obesity 30.3% 39.7%
Disability Percentage 39.0% 20.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Parkman vs Clarksville

  • In Clarksville, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 21.0% compared to 14.9% in Parkman.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Clarksville at 27.9% versus 20.5% in Parkman.
  • Clarksville has a higher smoking rate at 24.5% compared to 16.9% in Parkman.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Parkman at 19.5% compared to 13.9% in Clarksville.
  • Clarksville has higher obesity rates at 39.7% compared to 30.3% in Parkman.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Parkman at 39.0% compared to 20.0% in Clarksville.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Parkman Clarksville
No Schooling 0.0% (Data is updating) 4.2% (402)
High School Diploma 20.9% (99) 21.6% (2,064)
Less than High School 9.3% (44) 28.6% (2,735)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 32.1% (152) 8.2% (786)

Education Levels Comparison: Parkman vs Clarksville

  • In Clarksville, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 4.2% compared to 0.0% in Parkman.
  • In Clarksville, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 21.6% compared to 20.9% in Parkman.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Clarksville at 28.6%, compared to 9.3% in Parkman.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Parkman hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 32.1% compared to 8.2% in Clarksville.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.