Demographics details for Parkman, WY vs Alhambra, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Parkman, WY vs Alhambra, CA.
| Data | Parkman | Alhambra |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 473 | 80,259 |
| Median Age | 64.0 years | 41.1 years |
| Median Income | $61,216 | $80,234 |
| Married Families | 93.0% | 42.0% |
| Poverty Level | 5% | 13% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.0 | 4.9 |
Population Comparison: Parkman vs Alhambra
- The population in Alhambra is higher at 80,259, compared to 473 in Parkman.
- Residents in Parkman have a higher median age of 64.0 years compared to 41.1 years in Alhambra.
- Alhambra has a higher median income of $80,234, compared to $61,216 in Parkman.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Parkman at 93.0% compared to 42.0% in Alhambra.
- The poverty level is higher in Alhambra at 13%, compared to 5% in Parkman.
- Alhambra has a higher unemployment rate at 4.9% compared to 3.0% in Parkman.
Demographics
Demographics Parkman vs Alhambra provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Parkman | Alhambra |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 3 |
| White | 100 | -2 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 53 |
| Hispanic | Data is updating | 36 |
| Two or More Races | Data is updating | 9 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Parkman vs Alhambra
- In Alhambra, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 3% compared to 0% in Parkman.
- Parkman has a higher percentage of White residents at 100% compared to -2% in Alhambra.
- In Alhambra, the Asian population stands at 53%, greater than 0% in Parkman.
- Alhambra has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 36%, compared to 0% in Parkman.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Alhambra at 9%, compared to 0% in Parkman.
- In Alhambra, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Parkman.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Parkman | Alhambra |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 14.9% | 13.2% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 9.8% | 9.6% |
| Depression | 20.5% | 12.2% |
| Smoking | 16.9% | 9.7% |
| Binge Drinking | 19.5% | 11.9% |
| Obesity | 30.3% | 21.7% |
| Disability Percentage | 39.0% | 10.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Parkman vs Alhambra
- More residents in Parkman report poor mental health at 14.9% compared to 13.2% in Alhambra.
- Depression is more prevalent in Parkman at 20.5% compared to 12.2% in Alhambra.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Parkman at 16.9% compared to 9.7% in Alhambra.
- Binge drinking is more common in Parkman at 19.5% compared to 11.9% in Alhambra.
- Obesity rates are higher in Parkman at 30.3% compared to 21.7% in Alhambra.
- Disability percentages are higher in Parkman at 39.0% compared to 10.0% in Alhambra.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Parkman | Alhambra |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 4.2% (3,333) |
| High School Diploma | 20.9% (99) | 15.0% (12,003) |
| Less than High School | 9.3% (44) | 17.1% (13,697) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 32.1% (152) | 29.7% (23,804) |
Education Levels Comparison: Parkman vs Alhambra
- In Alhambra, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 4.2% compared to 0.0% in Parkman.
- A higher percentage of residents in Parkman hold a high school diploma at 20.9% compared to 15.0% in Alhambra.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Alhambra at 17.1%, compared to 9.3% in Parkman.
- A higher percentage of residents in Parkman hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 32.1% compared to 29.7% in Alhambra.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.