Demographics details for Parker, SD vs Watertown, MA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Parker, SD vs Watertown, MA.
| Data | Parker | Watertown |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 1,221 | 35,022 |
| Median Age | 39.3 years | 38.2 years |
| Median Income | $83,864 | $117,625 |
| Married Families | 39.0% | 42.0% |
| Poverty Level | 5% | 5% |
| Unemployment Rate | 2.0 | 3.4 |
Population Comparison: Parker vs Watertown
- The population in Watertown is higher at 35,022, compared to 1,221 in Parker.
- Residents in Parker have a higher median age of 39.3 years compared to 38.2 years in Watertown.
- Watertown has a higher median income of $117,625, compared to $83,864 in Parker.
- In Watertown, the percentage of married families is higher at 42.0%, compared to 39.0% in Parker.
- The poverty level is identical in both Parker and Watertown at 5%.
- Watertown has a higher unemployment rate at 3.4% compared to 2.0% in Parker.
Demographics
Demographics Parker vs Watertown provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Parker | Watertown |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 4 | 4 |
| White | 85 | 70 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 12 |
| Hispanic | 5 | 7 |
| Two or More Races | 4 | 7 |
| American Indian | 2 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Parker vs Watertown
- The percentage of Black residents is the same in both Parker and Watertown at 4%.
- Parker has a higher percentage of White residents at 85% compared to 70% in Watertown.
- In Watertown, the Asian population stands at 12%, greater than 0% in Parker.
- Watertown has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 7%, compared to 5% in Parker.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Watertown at 7%, compared to 4% in Parker.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Parker at 2% compared to 0% in Watertown.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Parker | Watertown |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 13.5% | 13.1% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 9.0% | 7.7% |
| Depression | 17.8% | 20.6% |
| Smoking | 16.4% | 8.6% |
| Binge Drinking | 20.4% | 19.3% |
| Obesity | 34.4% | 23.1% |
| Disability Percentage | 5.0% | 12.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Parker vs Watertown
- More residents in Parker report poor mental health at 13.5% compared to 13.1% in Watertown.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Watertown at 20.6% versus 17.8% in Parker.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Parker at 16.4% compared to 8.6% in Watertown.
- Binge drinking is more common in Parker at 20.4% compared to 19.3% in Watertown.
- Obesity rates are higher in Parker at 34.4% compared to 23.1% in Watertown.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Watertown at 12.0% compared to 5.0% in Parker.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Parker | Watertown |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.2% (3) | 0.9% (331) |
| High School Diploma | 17.9% (218) | 10.7% (3,731) |
| Less than High School | 13.0% (159) | 6.9% (2,426) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 12.9% (158) | 52.6% (18,420) |
Education Levels Comparison: Parker vs Watertown
- In Watertown, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.9% compared to 0.2% in Parker.
- A higher percentage of residents in Parker hold a high school diploma at 17.9% compared to 10.7% in Watertown.
- More residents in Parker have less than a high school education at 13.0% compared to 6.9% in Watertown.
- In Watertown, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 52.6% compared to 12.9% in Parker.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.