Demographics details for Parker, SD vs Spanish fork, UT
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Parker, SD vs Spanish fork, UT.
| Data | Parker | Spanish fork |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 1,221 | 44,102 |
| Median Age | 39.3 years | 27.4 years |
| Median Income | $83,864 | $93,989 |
| Married Families | 39.0% | 43.0% |
| Poverty Level | 5% | 6% |
| Unemployment Rate | 2.0 | 3.8 |
Population Comparison: Parker vs Spanish fork
- The population in Spanish fork is higher at 44,102, compared to 1,221 in Parker.
- Residents in Parker have a higher median age of 39.3 years compared to 27.4 years in Spanish fork.
- Spanish fork has a higher median income of $93,989, compared to $83,864 in Parker.
- In Spanish fork, the percentage of married families is higher at 43.0%, compared to 39.0% in Parker.
- The poverty level is higher in Spanish fork at 6%, compared to 5% in Parker.
- Spanish fork has a higher unemployment rate at 3.8% compared to 2.0% in Parker.
Demographics
Demographics Parker vs Spanish fork provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Parker | Spanish fork |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 4 | 1 |
| White | 85 | 80 |
| Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 5 | 12 |
| Two or More Races | 4 | 7 |
| American Indian | 2 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Parker vs Spanish fork
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Parker at 4% compared to 1% in Spanish fork.
- Parker has a higher percentage of White residents at 85% compared to 80% in Spanish fork.
- Both Parker and Spanish fork have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- Spanish fork has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 12%, compared to 5% in Parker.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Spanish fork at 7%, compared to 4% in Parker.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Parker at 2% compared to 0% in Spanish fork.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Parker | Spanish fork |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 13.5% | 15.0% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 9.0% | 10.8% |
| Depression | 17.8% | 23.8% |
| Smoking | 16.4% | 7.7% |
| Binge Drinking | 20.4% | 8.3% |
| Obesity | 34.4% | 31.0% |
| Disability Percentage | 5.0% | 8.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Parker vs Spanish fork
- In Spanish fork, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 15.0% compared to 13.5% in Parker.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Spanish fork at 23.8% versus 17.8% in Parker.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Parker at 16.4% compared to 7.7% in Spanish fork.
- Binge drinking is more common in Parker at 20.4% compared to 8.3% in Spanish fork.
- Obesity rates are higher in Parker at 34.4% compared to 31.0% in Spanish fork.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Spanish fork at 8.0% compared to 5.0% in Parker.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Parker | Spanish fork |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.2% (3) | 0.4% (175) |
| High School Diploma | 17.9% (218) | 9.1% (4,010) |
| Less than High School | 13.0% (159) | 5.9% (2,583) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 12.9% (158) | 19.4% (8,546) |
Education Levels Comparison: Parker vs Spanish fork
- In Spanish fork, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.4% compared to 0.2% in Parker.
- A higher percentage of residents in Parker hold a high school diploma at 17.9% compared to 9.1% in Spanish fork.
- More residents in Parker have less than a high school education at 13.0% compared to 5.9% in Spanish fork.
- In Spanish fork, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 19.4% compared to 12.9% in Parker.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.